Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 18.10.2022 - 60785/19 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2022,28209) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
MØRCK JENSEN v. DENMARK
No violation of Article 7 - No punishment without law (Article 7-1 - Nullum crimen sine lege);No violation of Article 2 of Protocol No. 4 - Freedom of movement-general (Article 2 para. 1 of Protocol No. 4 - Freedom of movement) ...
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
MØRK JENSEN v. DENMARK
Art. 2, Art. 2 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 4 Art. 2, Protokoll Nr. 4 Art. 2 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 7 Art. 1 MRK
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... (2) Neu Zitiert selbst (9)
- EGMR - 34179/08 (anhängig)
[ENG]
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.10.2022 - 60785/19
This matter must be assessed on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration the specific circumstances of each case and, notably, whether the domestic courts have applied the law whose provisions are most favourable to the defendant (see Maktouf and Damjanovic v. Bosnia and Herzegovina [GC], nos. 2312/08 and 34179/08, § 65, ECHR 2013, and Jidic, cited above, § 82). - EGMR, 12.07.2007 - 74613/01
Rechtssache J. gegen DEUTSCHLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.10.2022 - 60785/19
The Court reiterates its settled case-law to the effect that it is primarily for the national authorities to interpret and apply domestic law (see, inter alia, Del Río Prada, cited above, § 105 and Jorgic v. Germany, no. 74613/01, § 102, ECHR 2007-III.) However, when a Convention right itself, Article 7 in the present case, requires that there was a legal basis for a conviction and sentence, the Court's powers of review encompass an examination of whether the result reached by the domestic courts was compatible with Article 7 of the Convention, even if there were differences between the legal approach and reasoning of this Court and the relevant domestic decisions. - EGMR, 25.05.1993 - 14307/88
KOKKINAKIS c. GRÈCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.10.2022 - 60785/19
Accordingly, many laws are inevitably couched in terms which, to a greater or lesser extent, are vague and whose interpretation and application are questions of practice (see Kokkinakis v. Greece, 25 May 1993, § 40, Series A no. 260-A; Del Río Prada, cited above, § 92; and Advisory opinion P16-2021-001, cited above, § 67).
- EGMR, 23.02.2017 - 43395/09
DE TOMMASO v. ITALY
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.10.2022 - 60785/19
Proceeding on the assumption that such a restriction falls under Article 2 of Protocol No. 4, it must therefore be examined whether the interference was "in accordance with law", pursued one or more of the legitimate aims set out in Article 2 § 3 of Protocol No. 4 and was "necessary in a democratic society" to achieve such an aim (see Nalbantski v. Bulgaria, no. 30943/04, § 61, 10 February 2011; Stamose v. Bulgaria, no. 29713/05, § 30, ECHR 2012; Kerimli v. Azerbaijan, no. 3967/09, § 45, 16 July 2015; and De Tommaso v. Italy [GC], no. 43395/09, § 105, 23 February 2017). - EGMR, 18.02.2020 - 45776/16
JIDIC v. ROMANIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.10.2022 - 60785/19
Those qualitative requirements must be satisfied as regards both the definition of an offence and the penalty the offence carries (see Del Río Prada, cited above, § 91; Jidic v. Romania, no. 45776/16, § 79, 18 February 2020; and Advisory opinion on the applicability of statutes of limitation to prosecution, conviction and punishment in respect of an offence constituting, in substance, an act of torture [GC], request no. P16-2021-001, Armenian Court of Cassation, § 67, 26 April 2022 ("Advisory opinion P16-2021-001")). - EGMR, 22.05.2001 - 33592/96
BAUMANN v. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.10.2022 - 60785/19
Nevertheless, it implies the right to travel to any country of the person's choice to which he or she may be admitted (see, inter alia, Baumann v. France, no. 33592/96, § 61, ECHR 2001-V, and Khlyustov v. Russia, no. 28975/05, § 64, 11 July 2013). - EGMR, 16.07.2015 - 3967/09
KERIMLI v. AZERBAIJAN
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.10.2022 - 60785/19
Proceeding on the assumption that such a restriction falls under Article 2 of Protocol No. 4, it must therefore be examined whether the interference was "in accordance with law", pursued one or more of the legitimate aims set out in Article 2 § 3 of Protocol No. 4 and was "necessary in a democratic society" to achieve such an aim (see Nalbantski v. Bulgaria, no. 30943/04, § 61, 10 February 2011; Stamose v. Bulgaria, no. 29713/05, § 30, ECHR 2012; Kerimli v. Azerbaijan, no. 3967/09, § 45, 16 July 2015; and De Tommaso v. Italy [GC], no. 43395/09, § 105, 23 February 2017). - EGMR, 11.07.2013 - 28975/05
KHLYUSTOV v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.10.2022 - 60785/19
Nevertheless, it implies the right to travel to any country of the person's choice to which he or she may be admitted (see, inter alia, Baumann v. France, no. 33592/96, § 61, ECHR 2001-V, and Khlyustov v. Russia, no. 28975/05, § 64, 11 July 2013). - EGMR, 10.02.2011 - 30943/04
NALBANTSKI v. BULGARIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.10.2022 - 60785/19
Proceeding on the assumption that such a restriction falls under Article 2 of Protocol No. 4, it must therefore be examined whether the interference was "in accordance with law", pursued one or more of the legitimate aims set out in Article 2 § 3 of Protocol No. 4 and was "necessary in a democratic society" to achieve such an aim (see Nalbantski v. Bulgaria, no. 30943/04, § 61, 10 February 2011; Stamose v. Bulgaria, no. 29713/05, § 30, ECHR 2012; Kerimli v. Azerbaijan, no. 3967/09, § 45, 16 July 2015; and De Tommaso v. Italy [GC], no. 43395/09, § 105, 23 February 2017).
- EGMR, 12.10.2023 - 34634/18
TOTAL S.A. ET VITOL S.A. c. FRANCE
Elle souligne ensuite que l'ensemble des juridictions internes (le tribunal correctionnel, la cour d'appel et la Cour de cassation) ont considéré que les dispositions de l'article 435-3 du code pénal étaient claires et applicables aux faits de l'espèce (voir, mutatis mutandis, Mørck Jensen c. Danemark, no 60785/19, §§ 40-43, 18 octobre 2022). - EGMR, 02.11.2023 - 1924/23
AL ASSAD c. FRANCE
En second lieu, la Cour relève que l'ensemble des juridictions internes ont considéré, dans leurs décisions longuement motivées, que la fraude fiscale, seconde infraction d'origine du délit de blanchiment, était avérée et prévisible (voir, mutatis mutandis, Mørck Jensen c. Danemark, no 60785/19, §§ 40-43, 18 octobre 2022).