Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 18.11.2010 - 8863/06 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2010,63296) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
MUSHTA v. UKRAINE
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
Violation of Art. 6-1 Non-pecuniary damage - award (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
[ENG]
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 18.11.2010 - 8863/06
- EGMR, 25.10.2017 - 8863/06
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 05.10.2000 - 31365/96
VARBANOV v. BULGARIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.11.2010 - 8863/06
The Court reiterates that, except in extraordinary cases, an application may only be rejected as abusive if it was knowingly based on untrue facts (see, for instance, Varbanov v. Bulgaria, no. 31365/96, § 36, ECHR 2000-X). - EGMR, 18.01.2005 - 74153/01
POPOV v. MOLDOVA (No. 1)
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.11.2010 - 8863/06
Thus, the Court is unable to conclude that the applicant has knowingly based her allegations of the failure of the Court of Appeal to inform her of that hearing on untrue information (see Popov v. Moldova (no. 1), no. 74153/01, § 45, 18 January 2005; and Daniliuc v. Moldova, no. 46581/99, § 32, 18 October 2005). - EGMR, 18.10.2005 - 46581/99
DANILIUC v. MOLDOVA
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.11.2010 - 8863/06
Thus, the Court is unable to conclude that the applicant has knowingly based her allegations of the failure of the Court of Appeal to inform her of that hearing on untrue information (see Popov v. Moldova (no. 1), no. 74153/01, § 45, 18 January 2005; and Daniliuc v. Moldova, no. 46581/99, § 32, 18 October 2005). - EGMR, 28.03.2006 - 23436/03
MELNYK v. UKRAINE
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.11.2010 - 8863/06
However, the rules in question, or the application of them, should themselves correspond to the principle of legal certainty and should not prevent litigants from making use of an available remedy (see Melnyk v. Ukraine, no. 23436/03, §§ 22-23, 28 March 2006). - VK Niedersachsen, 20.09.2002 - 18/02
Unverzüglichkeit der Rüge: Rügefrist beträgt bei einem fachkundigen Unternehmen …
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.11.2010 - 8863/06
18/02/2011.