Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  DYBEKU v. ALBANIA

  Art. 3 MRK
  Violation of Art. 3 (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 18.12.2007 - 41153/06
• EGMR, 21.09.2016 - 41153/06

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (17)

• EGMR, 01.03.2001 - 22493/93

  BERKTAY c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.12.2007 - 41153/06

  As to the pecuniary damage allegedly caused, the Court reiterates that there must be a clear causal connection between the damage claimed by the applicant and the violation of the Convention (see Barberà, Messegué and Jabardo v. Spain, judgment of 13 June 1994 (former Article 50), Series A no. 285-C, §§ 16-20; see also Berktay v. Turkey, no. 22493/93, § 215, 1 March 2001; and Khudobin v. Russia, no. 59696/00, § 142, ECHR 2006-... (extracts)).
• EGMR, 26.10.2006 - 59696/00

  KHUDOBIN v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.12.2007 - 41153/06

  As to the pecuniary damage allegedly caused, the Court reiterates that there must be a clear causal connection between the damage claimed by the applicant and the violation of the Convention (see Barberà, Messegué and Jabardo v. Spain, judgment of 13 June 1994 (former Article 50), Series A no. 285-C, §§ 16-20; see also Berktay v. Turkey, no. 22493/93, § 215, 1 March 2001; and Khudobin v. Russia, no. 59696/00, § 142, ECHR 2006-... (extracts)).
• EGMR, 13.06.1994 - 10588/83

  BARBERÀ, MESSEGUÉ AND JABARDO v. SPAIN (ARTICLE 50)

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.12.2007 - 41153/06

  As to the pecuniary damage allegedly caused, the Court reiterates that there must be a clear causal connection between the damage claimed by the applicant and the violation of the Convention (see Barberà, Messegué and Jabardo v. Spain, judgment of 13 June 1994 (former Article 50), Series A no. 285-C, §§ 16-20; see also Berktay v. Turkey, no. 22493/93, § 215, 1 March 2001; and Khudobin v. Russia, no. 59696/00, § 142, ECHR 2006-... (extracts)).

 
• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 22277/93

  ILHAN c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.12.2007 - 41153/06

  The lack of appropriate medical care may amount to treatment contrary to Article 3 (see Ä°lhan v. Turkey [GC], no. 22277/93, § 87, ECHR 2000-VII; Naumenko v. Ukraine, no. 42023/98, § 112, 10 February 2004; and Farbtuhs v. Latvia, no. 4672/02, § 51, 2 December 2004).
• EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96

  Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.12.2007 - 41153/06

  The assessment of this minimum level of severity is, in the nature of things, relative; it depends on all the circumstances of the case, such as the duration of the treatment, its physical and mental effects and, in some cases, the sex, age and state of health of the victim (see Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 91, ECHR 2000-XI; Mouisel v. France, no. 67263/01, § 37, ECHR 2002-IX; and Papon v. France (no. 1) (dec.), no. 64666/01, ECHR 2001-VI).
• EGMR, 21.12.2000 - 30873/96

  EGMEZ c. CHYPRE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.12.2007 - 41153/06

  Taking into account the cumulative effects of the entirely inappropriate conditions of detention to which the applicant was subjected, which clearly had a detrimental effect on his health and well-being (see Kalashnikov, cited above, § 98), the CPT's findings in its latest reports concerning the conditions of detention in Albanian prisons, particularly with regard to mentally ill prisoners (see paragraphs 19-20 above), and its own case-law in this area (see paragraph 41 above), the Court considers that the nature, duration and severity of the ill-treatment to which the applicant was subjected and the cumulative negative effects on his health are sufficient to be qualified as inhuman and degrading (see Egmez v. Cyprus, no. 30873/96, § 77, ECHR 2000-XII; Labzov v. Russia, no. 62208/00, § 45, 16 June 2005; and Mayzit v. Russia, no. 63378/00, § 42, 20 January 2005).
• EGMR, 19.04.2001 - 28524/95

  PEERS v. GREECE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.12.2007 - 41153/06

  The question whether the purpose of the treatment was to humiliate or debase the victim is a further factor to be taken into account, but the absence of any such purpose cannot conclusively rule out a violation of Article 3 (see Peers v. Greece, no. 28524/95, § 74, ECHR 2001-III; Kalashnikov v. Russia, no. 47095/99, § 101, ECHR 2002-VI and Ramirez Sanchez v. France [GC], no. 59450/00, § 119, ECHR 2006-...).
• EGMR, 07.06.2001 - 64666/01

  PAPON v. FRANCE (No. 1)

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.12.2007 - 41153/06

  The assessment of this minimum level of severity is, in the nature of things, relative; it depends on all the circumstances of the case, such as the duration of the treatment, its physical and mental effects and, in some cases, the sex, age and state of health of the victim (see Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 91, ECHR 2000-XI; Mouisel v. France, no. 67263/01, § 37, ECHR 2002-IX; and Papon v. France (no. 1) (dec.), no. 64666/01, ECHR 2001-VI).
• EGMR, 15.07.2002 - 47095/99

  Russland, Haftbedingungen, EMRK, Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention, …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.12.2007 - 41153/06

  The question whether the purpose of the treatment was to humiliate or debase the victim is a further factor to be taken into account, but the absence of any such purpose cannot conclusively rule out a violation of Article 3 (see Peers v. Greece, no. 28524/95, § 74, ECHR 2001-III; Kalashnikov v. Russia, no. 47095/99, § 101, ECHR 2002-VI and Ramirez Sanchez v. France [GC], no. 59450/00, § 119, ECHR 2006-...).
• EGMR, 14.11.2002 - 67263/01

  MOUISEL v. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.12.2007 - 41153/06

  The assessment of this minimum level of severity is, in the nature of things, relative; it depends on all the circumstances of the case, such as the duration of the treatment, its physical and mental effects and, in some cases, the sex, age and state of health of the victim (see Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 91, ECHR 2000-XI; Mouisel v. France, no. 67263/01, § 37, ECHR 2002-IX; and Papon v. France (no. 1) (dec.), no. 64666/01, ECHR 2001-VI).
• EGMR, 29.04.2003 - 38812/97

  POLTORATSKIY v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 11.03.2004 - 40653/98

  IORGOV v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 11.03.2004 - 42346/98

  G.B. v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 02.12.2004 - 4672/02

  FARBTUHS c. LETTONIE
• EGMR, 28.01.1994 - 17549/90

  HURTADO c. SUISSE
• EGMR, 24.09.1992 - 10533/83

  HERCZEGFALVY c. AUTRICHE
• EGMR, 06.03.2001 - 40907/98

  Griechenland, Ausweisung, Abschiebung, Abschiebungshaft, Haftbedingungen, …