Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  SLADKOV v. RUSSIA

  (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (9)

• EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96

  Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.12.2008 - 13979/03

  The Court reiterates that Article 13 guarantees an effective remedy before a national authority for a prolonged non-enforcement of a binding judgment (see, mutatis mutandis, Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 156, ECHR 2000-XI).
• EGMR, 07.05.2002 - 59498/00

  BURDOV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.12.2008 - 13979/03

  The Court reiterates that an unreasonably long delay in the enforcement of a binding judgment may breach the Convention (see Burdov v. Russia, no. 59498/00, ECHR 2002-III).
• EGMR, 06.03.2003 - 41510/98

  JASIUNIENE v. LITHUANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.12.2008 - 13979/03

  This new judgment would not bring the applicant closer to his goal, that is the actual enforcement (see JasiÅ«niene v. Lithuania (dec.), no. 41510/98, 24 October 2000; Plotnikovy v. Russia, no. 43883/02, § 16, 24 February 2005).

 
• EGMR, 24.02.2005 - 43883/02

  PLOTNIKOVY v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.12.2008 - 13979/03

  This new judgment would not bring the applicant closer to his goal, that is the actual enforcement (see JasiÅ«niene v. Lithuania (dec.), no. 41510/98, 24 October 2000; Plotnikovy v. Russia, no. 43883/02, § 16, 24 February 2005).
• EGMR, 15.02.2007 - 18/03

  VANZHULA v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.12.2008 - 13979/03

  18/03/2009.
• EGMR, 15.02.2007 - 22000/03

  RAYLYAN v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.12.2008 - 13979/03

  To decide if the delay was reasonable, the Court will look at how complex the enforcement proceedings were, how the applicant and the authorities behaved, and what the nature of the award was (see Raylyan v. Russia, no. 22000/03, § 31, 15 February 2007).
• EGMR, 12.04.2007 - 13820/04

  GRIGORYEV AND KAKAUROVA v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.12.2008 - 13979/03

  With regard to the compatibility ratione temporis, the Court notes that on the date of introduction of the application the judgment of 21 January 1998 remained unenforced, and the Court is hence competent to examine this complaint (see Grigoryev and Kakaurova v. Russia, no. 13820/04, § 26, 12 April 2007).
• EGMR, 03.04.2008 - 11589/04

  TETSEN v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.12.2008 - 13979/03

  With regard to application of Article 6, the Court recalls that it has already dismissed the Government's similar arguments in another case (see Tetsen v. Russia, no. 11589/04, § 18, 3 April 2008).
• EKMR, 19.07.1968 - 3435/67

  W., X., Y. AND Z. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.12.2008 - 13979/03

  This rule covers also the obligation to continue a service entered into voluntarily (see W, X, Y, and Z v. United Kingdom, nos 3435/67, 3436/67, 3437/67, and 3438/67, Commission decision of 19 July 1968, Collection 28, pp. 109-131).