Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 18.12.2008 - 750/02 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2008,56529) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
KOTLYAROV v. RUSSIA
(englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 08.12.1999 - 28541/95
PELLEGRIN v. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.12.2008 - 750/02
The Government, relying on the Court's judgment in the case of Pellegrin v. France ([GC], no. 28541/95, ECHR 1999-VIII), argued that the applicant's complaint under Article 6 of the Convention was inadmissible ratione materiae. - EGMR, 19.04.2007 - 63235/00
VILHO ESKELINEN AND OTHERS v. FINLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.12.2008 - 750/02
The Court reiterates that this Article does not apply to cases where domestic law expressly excludes access to a court for the category of staff in question, and where this exclusion is justified by the State's objective interest (see Vilho Eskelinen and Others v. Finland [GC], no. 63235/00, § 62, ECHR 2007-...). - EGMR, 07.06.2007 - 2999/03
DOVGUCHITS v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.12.2008 - 750/02
Accordingly, Article 6 is applicable (compare with Dovguchits v. Russia, no. 2999/03, § 24, 7 June 2007), and the Government's objection must be dismissed. - EGMR, 21.06.2007 - 2191/03
PRIDATCHENKO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.12.2008 - 750/02
The Court has frequently found violations of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 in cases raising issues similar to the ones in the present case (see, among other authorities, Burdov v. Russia, no. 59498/00, ECHR 2002-III and Pridatchenko and Others v. Russia, nos. 2191/03 et seq., 21 June 2007).