Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 18.12.2012 - 16761/09 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2012,55041) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
G.B. AND R.B. v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1 MRK
Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life) (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
[ENG]
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 18.12.2012 - 16761/09
- EGMR, 25.10.2017 - 16761/09
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 14.09.2011 - 61827/00
GLASS CONTRE LE ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.12.2012 - 16761/09
The Court observes that, although the applicants alleged that the treatment endured by the first applicant also gave rise to an interference with the second applicant's right to respect for his family life, it considers that it is only required to examine the issues raised from the standpoint of the first applicant's right to respect for her physical integrity, having regard, of course, to the second applicant's role as her husband (see, mutatis mutandis, Glass v. the United Kingdom, no. 61827/00, § 72, ECHR 2004-II). - EGMR, 29.04.2002 - 2346/02
Vereinbarkeit der strafrechtlichen Verfolgung der Beihilfe zum Selbstmord mit der …
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.12.2012 - 16761/09
It covers, inter alia, the physical and psychological integrity of a person (see X and Y v. the Netherlands, 26 March 1985, § 22, Series A no. 91, and Pretty v. the United Kingdom, no. 2346/02, § 61, ECHR 2002-III). - EGMR, 04.01.2005 - 14462/03
PENTIACOVA ET AUTRES c. MOLDOVA
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.12.2012 - 16761/09
The Government argued that the present case did not differ in any significant manner from that of Pentiacova and Others v. Moldova ((dec.), no. 14462/03, ECHR 2005-I), in which the Court had found no violation of Article 8 of the Convention in respect of the State's insufficient funding of haemodialysis.