Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  DVALISHVILI v. GEORGIA

  Art. 3 MRK
  Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect) Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect) (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 18.12.2012 - 19634/07
• EGMR, 03.12.2020 - 19634/07

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (5)

• EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95

  LABITA c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.12.2012 - 19634/07

  In respect of a person deprived of his liberty, recourse to physical force which has not been made strictly necessary by his own conduct diminishes human dignity and is in principle an infringement of the right set forth in Article 3. (see Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, 6 April 2000, §§ 119-20, ECHR 2000-IV).
• EGMR, 10.07.2001 - 25657/94

  AVSAR c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.12.2012 - 19634/07

  In assessing evidence, the Court has adopted the standard of proof "beyond reasonable doubt" (see Orhan v. Turkey, no. 25656/94, § 264, 18 June 2002, and Avsar v. Turkey, no. 25657/94, § 282, ECHR 2001-VII).
• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 21986/93

  Verursachung des Todes eines Gefangenen in türkischer Haft - Umfang der …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.12.2012 - 19634/07

  Indeed, the burden of proof may be regarded as resting on the authorities to provide a satisfactory and convincing explanation (see Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 100, ECHR 2000-VII).
• EGMR, 18.06.2002 - 25656/94

  ORHAN v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.12.2012 - 19634/07

  In assessing evidence, the Court has adopted the standard of proof "beyond reasonable doubt" (see Orhan v. Turkey, no. 25656/94, § 264, 18 June 2002, and Avsar v. Turkey, no. 25657/94, § 282, ECHR 2001-VII).
• EGMR, 30.10.2001 - 32990/96

  KARADEMIR v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.12.2012 - 19634/07

  In this connection, the Court reiterates that the medical examinations of presumed victims of ill-treatment should be conducted outside the presence of police officers and other government officials in order to attain the required standards of independence and thoroughness (see Akkoç v. Turkey, nos. 22947/93 and 22948/93, § 118, ECHR 2000-X; Karademir v. Turkey, no. 32990/96, § 53, 30 October 2001; and Lopata v. Russia, no. 72250/01, § 114, 13 July 2010).

• EGMR, 07.10.2014 - 28490/02

  BEGHELURI AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA

  In assessing evidence in a claim of a violation of Article 3 of the Convention, the Court adopts the standard of proof "beyond reasonable doubt." Such proof may, however, follow from the coexistence of sufficiently strong, clear and concordant inferences or of similar unrebutted presumptions of fact (see Farbtuhs v. Latvia, no. 4672/02, § 54, 2 December 2004; Bazjaks v. Latvia, no. 71572/01, § 74, 19 October 2010; Gharibashvili v. Georgia, no. 11830/03, § 56, 29 July 2008; and Dvalishvili v. Georgia, no. 19634/07, § 39, 18 December 2012).