Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  KULYKOV AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE

  Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings;Article 6-1 - Impartial tribunal;Independent tribunal);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life) ...

• juris(Abodienst) (Volltext/Leitsatz)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  KULYKOV v. UKRAINE and 17 other applications

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 7, Art. 7 Abs. 1, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 8 Abs. 2, Art. 10, Art. 10 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 14, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1... , Protokoll Nr. 7 Art. 4 MRK
  [ENG]

Papierfundstellen

• NJW 2018, 2029

Wird zitiert von ... (7)Neu Zitiert selbst (4)

• EGMR, 09.01.2013 - 21722/11

  OLEKSANDR VOLKOV c. UKRAINE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.01.2017 - 5114/09

  Other provisions of domestic law can be found in Oleksandr Volkov v. Ukraine (no. 21722/11, §§ 56-77, ECHR 2013).

  Having regard to the findings in the case of Oleksandr Volkov v. Ukraine ( no. 21722/11, §§ 165-87, ECHR 2013), the Court decided that, for the sake of a uniform approach and equal protection of human rights, the complaint under Article 8 of the Convention should be examined in all the applications.

• EGMR, 06.07.2005 - 43579/98

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.01.2017 - 5114/09

  The question to be decided in such cases is the level of just satisfaction, in respect of either past or future pecuniary loss, to be awarded to an applicant, which is a matter to be determined by the Court at its discretion, having regard to what is equitable (see Nachova and Others v. Bulgaria [GC], nos. 43577/98 and 43579/98, § 171, ECHR 2005-VII).
• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 22277/93

  ILHAN c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.01.2017 - 5114/09

  In that regard, the Government referred to Ilhan v. Turkey ([GC], no. 22277/93, § 109, ECHR 2000-VII), in which the applicant's claim for compensation of future medical expenses was dismissed.
• EGMR, 17.07.2014 - 47848/08

  CENTRE FOR LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN CÂMPEANU v. ROMANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.01.2017 - 5114/09

  It holds, therefore, that there is no need to give a separate ruling on the remaining complaints (see, among other authorities, Varnava and Others, cited above, §§ 210 - 211, and Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, § 156, ECHR 2014, with further references).

• EGMR, 11.07.2017 - 19867/12

  MOREIRA FERREIRA v. PORTUGAL (No. 2)

  5114/09 and 17 others, § 148, 19 January 2017.
• EGMR - 54738/13 (anhängig)

  KOZAK v. UKRAINE and 2 other applications

  Domestic law governing the procedure for dismissal of judges for "breach of oath", international and comparative-law material can be found in Oleksandr Volkov v. Ukraine (no. 21722/11, §§ 56-82, ECHR 2013) and Kulykov and Others v. Ukraine (nos. 5114/09 and 17 others, §§ 107-116, 19 January 2017).

  5114/09 and 17 others, §§ 135-137, 19 January 2017)?.

  5114/09 and 17 others, §§ 138 and 139, 19 January 2017)?.

• EGMR, 15.12.2020 - 33399/18

  PISKIN v. TURKEY

  It has addressed cases, in particular, of soldiers returning to civilian life (see Smith and Grady v. the United Kingdom, nos. 33985/96 and 33986/96, ECHR 1999-VI), of removals from office of judges and prosecutors (see Özpinar, cited above, Oleksandr Volkov, cited above, and Kulykov and Others v. Ukraine, nos. 5114/09 and 17 others, 19 January 2017), and of a transfer within the civil service (see Sodan v. Turkey, no. 18650/05, 2 February 2016).

 
• EGMR, 14.03.2024 - 62020/14

  MOLDOVAN v. UKRAINE

  As to the lawyer's fees, the Government argued that the amount claimed by the applicant was excessive; in this respect they referred to the awards made by the Court in Kulykov and Others v. Ukraine (nos. 5114/09 and 17 others, § 159, 19 January 2017) and Bogdanov v. Ukraine ([Committee], no. 27380/20, § 21, 4 May 2023).
• EGMR, 09.03.2021 - 1571/07

  BILGEN v. TURKEY

  5114/09 and 17 others, §§ 118 and 132, 19 January 2017; Sturua v. Georgia, no. 45729/05, § 27, 28 March 2017; and Kamenos v. Cyprus, no. 147/07, § 88, 31 October 2017), removed from an administrative position without the termination of their duties as a judge (see Baka, §§ 34 and 107-11, and Denisov, §§ 25, 47-48 and 54, both cited above) or suspended from judicial office (see Paluda v. Slovakia, no. 33392/12, § 34, 23 May 2017) or otherwise subjected to a disciplinary sanction (see Ramos Nunes de Carvalho e Sá, cited above, §§ 119-20).
• EGMR, 20.06.2023 - 24492/21

  OKTAY ALKAN v. TÜRKIYE

  5114/09 and 17 others, §§ 118 and 132, 19 January 2017; Sturua v. Georgia, no. 45729/05, § 27, 28 March 2017; Kamenos v. Cyprus, no. 147/07, §§ 82-88, 31 October 2017; and Mnatsakanyan v. Armenia, no. 2463/12, §§ 49-59, 6 December 2022), reduction in salary following conviction for a serious disciplinary offence (see Harabin v. Slovakia, no. 58688/11, §§ 118-23, 20 November 2012), removal from post (for example, President of the Supreme Court, President of the Court of Appeal or Vice-President of the Regional Court) while remaining a judge (see Baka, cited above, §§ 34 and 107-11; Denisov, cited above, § 54; and Broda and Bojara v. Poland, nos. 26691/18 and 27367/18, §§ 121-23, 29 June 2021), functions other than the principal activity of a judge (premature termination of the term of office of a judge elected to serve in the judicial council) while remaining a judge (see Grzeda, cited above, §§ 289-327) or judges being prevented from exercising their judicial functions after legislative reform (see Gumenyuk and Others v. Ukraine, no. 11423/19, §§ 61 and 65-67, 22 July 2021).
• EGMR, 07.06.2018 - 16314/13

  NOVOTNÝ v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC

  Where it is clear from the outset that no effective remedy is available to the applicant, the period runs from the date of the acts or measures complained of, or from the date of knowledge of that act or its effect or prejudice on the applicant (see, among many authorities, Kulykov and Others v. Ukraine, no. 5114/09 and 17 others, § 125, 19 January 2017).