Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 19.01.2017 - 8725/07 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2017,447) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
STAMOVA v. BULGARIA
Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions);Violation of Article 13+P1-1 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - ...
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
STAMOVA v. BULGARIA
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 13+P1 Abs. 1, Art. 14, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EuGH, 05.03.1996 - C-46/93
Brasserie du pêcheur / Bundesrepublik Deutschland und The Queen / Secretary of …
Auszug aus EGMR, 19.01.2017 - 8725/07
In a case examining the extent and type of States" liability for breaches of European Community law by their institutions, the Court of Justice of the European Union held that a rule excluding loss of profit claims was not compatible with Community law (see the judgment of 3 March 1996 in the case of Brasserie du Pêcheur SA v. Federal Republic of Germany, .-46/93 and .-48/93, EU:C:1996:79). - EGMR, 02.05.2006 - 50177/99
KÖSE ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 19.01.2017 - 8725/07
However, exhaustion has been deemed to have been complied with where the final stage of the exhaustion of the domestic remedies takes place after the application has been submitted but before the Court decides on its admissibility (see, for example, Yakup Köse v. Turkey (dec.), no. 50177/99, 2 May 2006, and Sneersone and Kampanella, cited above, § 66). - EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 25803/94
Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des …
Auszug aus EGMR, 19.01.2017 - 8725/07
In other words, the Bulgarian State has been afforded the opportunity of preventing the violation alleged against it (see Sneersone and Kampanella v. Italy, no. 14737/09, § 66, 12 July 2011, and Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 74, ECHR 1999-V). - EGMR, 09.12.1994 - 13427/87
RAFFINERIES GRECQUES STRAN ET STRATIS ANDREADIS c. GRÈCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 19.01.2017 - 8725/07
The Court further reiterates that a "claim" can constitute a "possession" within the meaning of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 if it is sufficiently established to be enforceable (see Stran Greek Refineries and Stratis Andreadis v. Greece, judgment of 9 December 1994, Series A no. 301-B, p. 84, § 59; Burdov v. Russia, no. 59498/00, § 40, ECHR 2002-III).