Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  SHLYKOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  SHLYKOV v. RUSSIA

  Art. 3 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (7)Neu Zitiert selbst (7)

• EGMR, 23.02.2016 - 11138/10

  Transnistrien

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.01.2021 - 78638/11

  The State must ensure that a person is detained in conditions which are compatible with respect for human dignity, that the manner and method of the execution of the measure do not subject him or her to distress or hardship of an intensity exceeding the unavoidable level of suffering inherent in detention and that, given the practical demands of imprisonment, his or her health and well-being are adequately secured (see Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, §§ 92-94, ECHR 2000-XI, and Mozer v. the Republic of Moldova and Russia [GC], no. 11138/10, § 178, 23 February 2016).
• EGMR, 04.12.2008 - 30562/04

  S. und Marper ./. Vereinigtes Königreich

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.01.2021 - 78638/11

  30562/04 and 30566/04, § 134, ECHR 2008; and Vinter and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos.
• EGMR, 18.12.1986 - 9697/82

  JOHNSTON AND OTHERS v. IRELAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.01.2021 - 78638/11

  However, once this burden of proof has been satisfied it falls to the applicant to establish that the remedy advanced by the Government had in fact been used or was for some reason inadequate and ineffective in the particular circumstances of the case or that there existed special circumstances absolving him or her from the requirement (see Johnston and Others v. Ireland, 18 December 1986, § 22, Series A no. 112; Vernillo v. France, 20 February 1991, § 27, Series A no. 198; and Ananyev and Others v. Russia, nos. 42525/07 and 60800/08, § 94, 10 January 2012).

 
• EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95

  LABITA c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.01.2021 - 78638/11

  It prohibits in absolute terms torture or inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, irrespective of the circumstances and the victim's behaviour (see, for example, Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 119, ECHR 2000-IV, and Mursic v. Croatia [GC], no. 7334/13, § 96, 20 October 2016).
• EGMR, 04.12.2008 - 30566/04

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.01.2021 - 78638/11

  30562/04 and 30566/04, § 134, ECHR 2008; and Vinter and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos.
• EGMR - 43441/08 (anhängig)

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.01.2021 - 78638/11

  The Government must raise an explicit plea of inadmissibility on grounds of failure to exhaust domestic remedies (see Svinarenko and Slyadnev v. Russia [GC], nos. 32541/08 and 43441/08, § 79, ECHR 2014 (extracts)).
• EGMR, 24.09.2002 - 27824/95

  POSTI AND RAHKO v. FINLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.01.2021 - 78638/11

  The concept of a "continuing situation" refers to a state of affairs in which there are continuous activities by or on the part of the State which render the applicant a victim (see Posti and Rahko v. Finland, no. 27824/95, § 39, ECHR 2002-VII).

• EGMR, 15.02.2024 - 42771/19

  YEMANOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that they also disclose violations of the Convention in the light of its findings in Svinarenko and Slyadnev v. Russia [GC] (nos. 32541/08 and 43441/08, ECHR 2014 (extracts)), Idalov v. Russia [GC] (no. 5826/03, 22 May 2012), Gorlov and Others v. Russia (nos. 27057/06 and 2 others, 2 July 2019), Polyakova and Others v. Russia (nos. 35090/09 and 3 others, 7 March 2017), Shlykov and Others v. Russia (nos. 78638/11 and 3 others, 19 January 2021).

  78638/11 and 3 others, §§ 77-93, 19 January 2021,.

  3 - torture or inhuman or degrading treatment - routine handcuffing at the IK-5 Volodga Region since 10/11/1994 - pending on the date when the application was lodged with the Court (Shlykov and Others v. Russia, nos. 78638/11 and 3 others, §§ 77-93, 19 January 2021).

  3 - torture or inhuman or degrading treatment - routine handcuffing in IK-5 Vologda Region (Shlykov and Others v. Russia, nos. 78638/11 and 3 others, §§ 77-93, 19 January 2021),.

  78638/11 and 3 others,.

  3 - torture or inhuman or degrading treatment - routine handcuffing in IK-2 Perm Region since 05/08/2004 and pending on the date when the application was lodged with the Court (Shlykov and Others v. Russia, nos. 78638/11 and 3 others, §§ 77-93, 19 January 2021).

  78638/11 and 3 others,.

  3 - torture or inhuman or degrading treatment - inhuman and degrading treatment - routine handcuffing in IK 5, Vologda Region since 01/08/1994 and pending on the date when the application was lodged with the Court (Shlykov and Others v. Russia, nos. 78638/11 and 3 others, §§ 77-93, 19 January 2021),.

  78638/11 and 3 others,.

  3 - torture or inhuman or degrading treatment - routine handcuffing in IK-5 Vologda Region between 29/07/1996 and 10/2021 (Shlykov and Others v. Russia, nos. 78638/11 and 3 others, §§ 77-93, 19 January 2021),.

• BVerfG, 19.01.2023 - 2 BvR 1719/21

  Erfolgreiche Verfassungsbeschwerde eines Sicherungsverwahrten gegen die …

  Der EGMR bezieht bei der Beurteilung der Frage, ob eine Fesselung gegen Art. 3 EMRK verstößt, die individuelle Vorgeschichte und den Gesundheitszustand des betroffenen Gefangenen, etwaiges gefährliches Vorverhalten in Haft, ergänzend angewandte Sicherungsmaßnahmen sowie die Dauer und öffentliche Wahrnehmbarkeit der Fesselung ein (vgl. EGMR, Shlykov and others v. Russia, Urteil vom 19. Januar 2021, Nr. 78638/11, §§ 72 ff.).

  Die mit der Fesselung verbundene Zwangsanwendung ist auf das unausweichliche Maß zu beschränken (vgl. EGMR, Shlykov and others v. Russia, Urteil vom 19. Januar 2021, Nr. 78638/11, § 72).

  Maßgeblich zu berücksichtigen ist, ob die Fesselung angeordnet wurde, obwohl der Gefangene durch sein Verhalten während der Haft in der Vergangenheit keinen Grund zu Beanstandungen gegeben hat (vgl. EGMR, Shlykov and others v. Russia, Urteil vom 19. Januar 2021, Nr. 78638/11, §§ 72 ff.; Kashavelov v. Bulgaria, Urteil vom 20. Januar 2011, Nr. 891/05, §§ 38 ff.; Salakhov and Islyamova v. Ukraine, Urteil vom 14. März 2013, Nr. 28005/08, § 154).

• EGMR, 13.10.2022 - 7427/18

  RADEYKO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  78638/11 and 3 others, §§ 69-93, 19 January 2021, concerning routine handcuffing of detainees under strict imprisonment regime, Sergey Babushkin v. Russia, no. 5993/08, 28 November 2013, concerning conditions of post-conviction detention, and Gorlov and Others, cited above, §§ 101-10, concerning lack of an effective remedy in respect of the complaint about placement of detainees under permanent video surveillance).

  3 - inadequate conditions of detention under strict imprisonment regime - Routine handcuffing since the applicant's conviction in 2007 (Shlykov and Others v. Russia, nos. 78638/11 and 3 others, §§ 77-93, 19 January 2021).

 
• EGMR, 07.12.2023 - 14767/16

  NAFTOGAZVYDOBUVANNYA, PJSC v. UKRAINE

  The circumstances of the present case are distinguishable from cases concerning a repetition of the same events rendering the applicant a victim, such as, for example, detainees' routine handcuffing, in which the Court considered that it would be excessively formalistic to demand that an applicant denouncing such a situation filed a new application at regular intervals for as long as that situation persisted (see, for example, Shlykov and Others v. Russia, nos. 78638/11 and 3 others, §§ 61 and 62, 19 January 2021).
• EGMR, 19.07.2022 - 55659/14

  RUDYKH AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  78638/11 and 3 others, §§ 36-40, 19 January 2021.
• EGMR, 07.07.2022 - 26363/18

  ZVEREV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case law (see, in particular, Gorlov and Others, cited above, with further references, § 120, and Shlykov and Others v. Russia, nos. 78638/11 and 3 others, §§ 109-11, 19 January 2021, which imposed on the respondent State a legal obligation, under Article 46 of the Convention, to implement, under the supervision of the Committee of Ministers, such measures as they consider appropriate to secure the right of the applicants and other persons in their position), the Court considers that the finding of a violation in respect of the complaints concerning the permanent video surveillance of detainees in post-conviction detention facilities and the lack of an effective remedy in that respect constitutes a sufficient just satisfaction in the present case.
• EGMR, 21.07.2022 - 57636/16

  DILSHNAYDER AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  78638/11 and 3 others, §§ 48-93, 19 January 2021, as regards routine handcuffing of inmates.