Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 19.03.2019 - 10661/08 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2019,9127) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
KOMMERSANT MOLDOVY v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
Inadmissible (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 14.02.2006 - 28793/02
CHRISTIAN DEMOCRATIC PEOPLE'S PARTY v. MOLDOVA
Auszug aus EGMR, 19.03.2019 - 10661/08
The applicant newspaper submitted a copy of a judgment adopted by the Supreme Court of Justice on 29 November 2006, in which a request for the reopening of the proceedings following the finding of a violation of Convention rights established by the Court was accepted (the case concerned was Christian Democratic People's Party v. Moldova, no. 28793/02, ECHR 2006-II). - EGMR, 06.05.2003 - 27569/02
FRANZ FISCHER contre l'AUTRICHE
Auszug aus EGMR, 19.03.2019 - 10661/08
This approach has been followed also in cases where reopening of terminated domestic judicial proceedings has been sought on the ground of a finding by the Court of a violation of the Convention (see, for instance, Fischer v. Austria(dec.), no. 27569/02, ECHR 2003 VI and Bochan (2), cited above, § 45). - EGMR, 18.09.2012 - 12214/07
EGMEZ v. CYPRUS
Auszug aus EGMR, 19.03.2019 - 10661/08
The Court refers to its case-law concerning the execution of the Court's judgments and the Court's competence to examine a new issue undecided by the previous judgment (see, for instance, Bochan v. Ukraine (no. 2) [GC], no. 22251/08, §§ 33 and 34, ECHR 2015, Egmez v. Cyprus ((dec.), no. 12214/07, §§ 48-56, 18 September 2012, and Kudeshkina v. Russia (dec.), 28727/11, §§ 52-68, 17 February 2015). - EGMR, 05.02.2015 - 22251/08
BOCHAN v. UKRAINE (No. 2)
Auszug aus EGMR, 19.03.2019 - 10661/08
The Court refers to its case-law concerning the execution of the Court's judgments and the Court's competence to examine a new issue undecided by the previous judgment (see, for instance, Bochan v. Ukraine (no. 2) [GC], no. 22251/08, §§ 33 and 34, ECHR 2015, Egmez v. Cyprus ((dec.), no. 12214/07, §§ 48-56, 18 September 2012, and Kudeshkina v. Russia (dec.), 28727/11, §§ 52-68, 17 February 2015). - EGMR, 17.02.2015 - 28727/11
KUDESHKINA v. RUSSIA (No. 2)
Auszug aus EGMR, 19.03.2019 - 10661/08
The Court refers to its case-law concerning the execution of the Court's judgments and the Court's competence to examine a new issue undecided by the previous judgment (see, for instance, Bochan v. Ukraine (no. 2) [GC], no. 22251/08, §§ 33 and 34, ECHR 2015, Egmez v. Cyprus ((dec.), no. 12214/07, §§ 48-56, 18 September 2012, and Kudeshkina v. Russia (dec.), 28727/11, §§ 52-68, 17 February 2015).