Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 19.03.2019 - 49089/10 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2019,5671) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
E.B. v. ROMANIA
Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Positive obligations) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Positive obligations;Article 8-1 - Respect for private life) ...
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
BALI v. ROMANIA
Wird zitiert von ... Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 15.03.2016 - 61495/11
M.G.C. v. ROMANIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 19.03.2019 - 49089/10
A detailed description of the relevant international material concerning violence against women can be found in M.G.C. v. Romania (no. 61495/11, §§ 38-46, 15 March 2016), and Balsan v. Romania (no. 49645/09, §§ 43-44, 23 May 2017).Therefore, having regard to the nature and the substance of the applicant's complaints, they fall to be examined under Articles 3 and 8 of the Convention (see M.G.C. v. Romania, no. 61495/11, § 48, 15 March 2016), which read as follows:.
- EGMR, 20.03.2018 - 37685/10
RADOMILJA AND OTHERS v. CROATIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 19.03.2019 - 49089/10
The Court reiterates that by virtue of the jura novit curia principle it is not bound by the legal grounds adduced by the applicant under the Convention and the Protocols thereto and has the power to decide on the characterisation to be given in law to the facts of a complaint by examining it under Articles or provisions of the Convention that are different from those relied upon by the applicant (see Radomilja and Others v. Croatia [GC], nos. 37685/10 and 22768/12, § 126, ECHR 2018).
- EGMR - 33066/22 (anhängig)
M.D. v. GEORGIA
Having regard to the positive obligations of States inherent in Article 3 of the Convention to carry out a thorough and effective investigation and prosecution of acts of sexual abuse and rape, has the investigation in the present case by the domestic authorities been in breach of the above-mentioned Article (see, for example, M.C. v. Bulgaria, no. 39272/98, ECHR 2003-XII, and E.B. v. Romania, no. 49089/10, 19 March 2019)?.