Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  DZASOKHOV v. GEORGIA

  Inadmissible (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (3)Neu Zitiert selbst (3)

• EGMR, 12.02.2013 - 152/04

  YEFIMENKO v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.03.2019 - 70243/11

  In this connection, the Court cannot overlook the fact that the applicant was at large throughout the relevant period of time and was never in fact imprisoned (see, a contrario, Hammerton, cited above, §§ 135-37, and Yefimenko v. Russia, no. 152/04, § 98, 12 February 2013).
• EGMR, 17.03.2016 - 6287/10

  HAMMERTON v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.03.2019 - 70243/11

  Such an acknowledgment, in the Court's opinion, given the scope of the retrial and its outcome, satisfies the first condition laid down in the Court's case-law (see Hammerton v. the United Kingdom, no. 6287/10, § 132, 17 March 2016; see also, mutatis mutandis, Staykov v. Bulgaria, no. 49438/99, § 90, 12 October 2006, and Akin Peker v. Turkey (dec.), no. 50702/18, § 17, 22 January 2019; contrast Pisano v. Italy (striking out) [GC], no. 36732/97, §§ 37-38, 24 October 2002).
• EGMR, 22.01.2019 - 50702/18

  AKIN PEKER v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.03.2019 - 70243/11

  Such an acknowledgment, in the Court's opinion, given the scope of the retrial and its outcome, satisfies the first condition laid down in the Court's case-law (see Hammerton v. the United Kingdom, no. 6287/10, § 132, 17 March 2016; see also, mutatis mutandis, Staykov v. Bulgaria, no. 49438/99, § 90, 12 October 2006, and Akin Peker v. Turkey (dec.), no. 50702/18, § 17, 22 January 2019; contrast Pisano v. Italy (striking out) [GC], no. 36732/97, §§ 37-38, 24 October 2002).

• EGMR, 06.07.2023 - 21181/19

  TULEYA v. POLAND

  The Court would then assess whether those subsequent proceedings deprived the applicant of victim status because he or she had been provided sufficient redress (see Sakhnovskiy, cited above, § 83, Khayrullin v. Russia (dec.), no. 58272/09, 2 July 2019 and Dzasokov v. Georgia, § 22 (dec.), no. 70243/11, 19 March 2019).".
• EGMR, 02.09.2021 - 72475/10

  TKHELIDZE v. GEORGIA

  In the course of the renewed criminal proceedings, while confirming her conviction, the Tbilisi Court of Appeal did not acknowledge, neither explicitly nor in substance, a violation of her rights under Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (d) of the Convention (see Pisano v. Italy (striking out) [GC], no. 36732/97, §§ 37-38, 24 October 2002; contrast Dzasokhov v. Georgia (dec.), no. 70243/11, § 22, 19 March 2019, with further references therein).
• EGMR, 24.03.2020 - 32479/16

  WEBSTER v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  The Court would then assess whether those subsequent proceedings deprived the applicant of victim status because he or she had been provided sufficient redress (see Sakhnovskiy, cited above, § 83, Khayrullin v. Russia (dec.), no. 58272/09, 2 July 2019 and Dzasokov v. Georgia, § 22 (dec.), no. 70243/11, 19 March 2019).