Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 19.04.2016 - 37957/15 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2016,9908) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
SOYUPOVA v. RUSSIA
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... Neu Zitiert selbst (6)
- EGMR, 21.09.2016 - 58263/00
TIMOFEYEV AND 234 OTHER CASES AGAINST THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION
Auszug aus EGMR, 19.04.2016 - 37957/15
Acts of the Soviet State lie outside the Convention's temporal reach (see, for example, Timofeyev v. Russia (dec.), no. 58263/00, 5 September 2002; Burkov v. Russia (dec.), no. 46671/99, 30 January 2001; mutatis mutandis Janowiec and Others v. Russia [GC], nos. - EGMR, 30.01.2001 - 46671/99
BURKOV v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 19.04.2016 - 37957/15
Acts of the Soviet State lie outside the Convention's temporal reach (see, for example, Timofeyev v. Russia (dec.), no. 58263/00, 5 September 2002; Burkov v. Russia (dec.), no. 46671/99, 30 January 2001; mutatis mutandis Janowiec and Others v. Russia [GC], nos. - EGMR, 15.04.2012 - 29520/09
[ENG]
Auszug aus EGMR, 19.04.2016 - 37957/15
55508/07 and 29520/09, § 151, ECHR 2013), even if the unsuccessful proceedings which aimed to redress those acts took place after ratification of the Convention (see Blecic, cited above, §§ 77-79).
- EGMR, 10.07.2002 - 39794/98
GRATZINGER ET GRATZINGEROVA c. REPUBLIQUE TCHEQUE
Auszug aus EGMR, 19.04.2016 - 37957/15
But if the State does assume this obligation by passing a law, and an applicant meets statutory entitlement conditions, he or she may acquire a "possession" within the meaning of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 in the form of a "legitimate expectation" of receiving compensation (see Gratzinger and Gratzingerova v. the Czech Republic (dec.), no. 39794/98, § 69, ECHR 2002-VII; Klaus and Yuri Kiladze, cited above, § 54). - EGMR, 08.03.2006 - 59532/00
BLECIC v. CROATIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 19.04.2016 - 37957/15
This principle, established in the Court's case-law, is based on the general rule of international law embodied in Article 28 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties of 23 May 1969 (see Blecic v. Croatia [GC], no. 59532/00, § 70, ECHR 2006-III). - EGMR, 06.11.1980 - 7367/76
GUZZARDI v. ITALY
Auszug aus EGMR, 19.04.2016 - 37957/15
The word "conviction" implies the finding of an offence in accordance with the law (see Guzzardi v. Italy, 6 November 1980, § 100, Series A no. 39), proven guilt and the imposition of a penalty (see Grosskopf v. Germany, no. 24478/03, § 43, 21 October 2010, and James, Wells and Lee v. the United Kingdom, nos. 25119/09, 57715/09 and 57877/09, § 189, 18 September 2012).
- EGMR, 19.10.2021 - 16101/18
CAMILLERI v. MALTA
The Court refers to its general principles concerning the application of Article 3 of Protocol No. 7 as set out and put in practice in its case-law (see, inter alia, Poghosyan and Baghdasaryan v. Armenia, no. 22999/06, §§ 49 -52, ECHR 2012 and Matveyev v. Russia, no. 26601/02, §§ 39-45, 3 July 2008; as well as Soyupova v. Russia, (dec.), no. 37957/15, 19 April 2016; Bachowski v. Poland, (dec.), no. 32463/06, 2 November 2010; Jeronovics v. Latvia, (dec.), no. 547/02, § 77, 10 February 2009, and Georgiou v. Greece, (dec.), no. 45138/98).