Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 19.05.2020 - 58982/12 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2020,11195) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
HEROSS LTD v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Access to court);Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Possessions) ...
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
HEROSS LTD v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 18.02.1999 - 26083/94
WAITE AND KENNEDY v. GERMANY
Auszug aus EGMR, 19.05.2020 - 58982/12
In doing so, the Court must bear in mind that it is in the first place the responsibility of national courts to interpret provisions of national law (see Waite and Kennedy v. Germany [GC], no. 26083/94, § 54, ECHR 1999-I). - EGMR, 22.03.2005 - 6267/02
ROSCA v. MOLDOVA
Auszug aus EGMR, 19.05.2020 - 58982/12
One of the fundamental aspects of the rule of law is the principle of legal certainty, which requires, among other things, that where the courts have finally determined an issue, their ruling should not be called into question (see Brumarescu v. Romania [GC], no. 28342/95, § 61, ECHR 1999-VII, and Ro??ca v. Moldova, no. 6267/02, § 24, 22 March 2005).