Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 19.06.2007 - 11638/02 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2007,70559) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
PAWLIK v. POLAND
Art. 8 MRK
Violation of Art. 8 (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 19.06.2007 - 11638/02
- EGMR, 17.12.2014 - 11638/02
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 24.03.1988 - 10465/83
OLSSON v. SWEDEN (No. 1)
Auszug aus EGMR, 19.06.2007 - 11638/02
In so doing, it must determine whether the reasons purporting to justify any measures taken with regard to an applicant's enjoyment of his right to respect for family life are relevant and sufficient (see, amongst other authorities, Olsson v. Sweden, judgment of 24 March 1988, Series A no. 130, p. 32, § 68). - EGMR, 23.09.1994 - 19823/92
HOKKANEN v. FINLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 19.06.2007 - 11638/02
In both contexts regard must be had to the fair balance that has to be struck between the competing interests of the individual and of the community as a whole; and in both contexts the State enjoys a certain margin of appreciation (see, Hokkanen v. Finland, judgment of 23 September 1994, Series A no. 299-A, p. 20, § 55). - EGMR, 27.04.2000 - 45023/98
BEN SALAH ADRAQUI and DHAIME v. SPAIN
Auszug aus EGMR, 19.06.2007 - 11638/02
The Court reiterates that domestic remedies cannot be said to be exhausted when an appeal has been rejected or not allowed because of a procedural mistake by the appellant (see Ben Salah Adraqui and Dhaime v. Spain (dec.), no. 45023/98, ECHR 2000-IV). - EGMR, 01.03.2005 - 15212/03
CHARZYNSKI c. POLOGNE
Auszug aus EGMR, 19.06.2007 - 11638/02
The relevant domestic law and practice concerning remedies for the excessive length of judicial proceedings are stated in the Court's decisions in the cases of Charzynski v. Poland no. 15212/03 (dec.), §§ 12-23, ECHR 2005-V and Ratajczyk v. Poland no. 11215/02 (dec.), ECHR 2005-VIII and its judgment in the case of Krasuski v. Poland, no. 61444/00, §§ 34-46, ECHR 2005-V.