Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ISMETA BACIC v. CROATIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 29, Art. 29 Abs. 3, Art. 41 MRK
  Violation of Art. 6-1 Remainder inadmissible Non-pecuniary damage - award (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 19.06.2008 - 43595/06
• EGMR, 08.03.2012 - 43595/06

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (4)

• EGMR, 13.07.2006 - 4856/03

  DUBINSKAYA v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.06.2008 - 43595/06

  The Court reiterates that Article 6 § 1 embodies the "right to a court", of which the right of access, that is the right to institute proceedings before a court in civil matters, constitutes one aspect (see Golder v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 21 February 1975, Series A no. 18, pp. 13-18, §§ 28-36, and Dubinskaya v. Russia, no. 4856/03, § 39, 13 July 2006).
• EKMR, 10.12.1984 - 10259/83

  S.p.r.l. ANCA and others v. BELGIUM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.06.2008 - 43595/06

  The Court reiterates at the outset that the applicability of Article 6 § 1 to bankruptcy proceedings is beyond doubt (see S.p.r.l. ANCA and Others v. Belgium, no. 10259/83, Commission decision of 10 December 1984, Decisions and Reports 40, p. 170; Interfina and Christian della Faille d'Huysse v. Belgium, no. 11101/84, Commission decision of 4 May 1987, unreported; Ceteroni v. Italy, judgment of 15 November 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-V; Bassani v. Italy, no. 47778/99, §§ 13 and 14, 11 December 2003; Capital Bank AD v. Bulgaria, no. 49429/99, § 86, ECHR 2005... (extracts); and Sukobljevic v. Croatia, no. 5129/03, § 37, 2 November 2006).
• EKMR, 04.05.1987 - 11101/84

  INTERFINA et FAILLE d'HUYSSE contre la Belgique

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.06.2008 - 43595/06

  The Court reiterates at the outset that the applicability of Article 6 § 1 to bankruptcy proceedings is beyond doubt (see S.p.r.l. ANCA and Others v. Belgium, no. 10259/83, Commission decision of 10 December 1984, Decisions and Reports 40, p. 170; Interfina and Christian della Faille d'Huysse v. Belgium, no. 11101/84, Commission decision of 4 May 1987, unreported; Ceteroni v. Italy, judgment of 15 November 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-V; Bassani v. Italy, no. 47778/99, §§ 13 and 14, 11 December 2003; Capital Bank AD v. Bulgaria, no. 49429/99, § 86, ECHR 2005... (extracts); and Sukobljevic v. Croatia, no. 5129/03, § 37, 2 November 2006).
• EGMR, 21.02.1975 - 4451/70

  GOLDER c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.06.2008 - 43595/06

  The Court reiterates that Article 6 § 1 embodies the "right to a court", of which the right of access, that is the right to institute proceedings before a court in civil matters, constitutes one aspect (see Golder v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 21 February 1975, Series A no. 18, pp. 13-18, §§ 28-36, and Dubinskaya v. Russia, no. 4856/03, § 39, 13 July 2006).

• EuG, 01.06.2022 - T-510/17

  Del Valle Ruiz u.a./ Kommission und CRU

  Wie die Kläger selbst hervorheben, enthält das Urteil des EGMR vom 24. November 2005, Capital Bank AD/Bulgarien (CE:ECHR:2005:1124JUD004942999), und auch das Urteil des EGMR vom 19. Juni 2008, 1smeta Bacic/Kroatien (CE:ECHR:2008:0619JUD004359506), die grundlegende Aussage, dass Art. 6 Abs. 1 EMRK auf ein Konkursverfahren Anwendung findet.