Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  YESILOVA v. TURKEY

  Inadmissible (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (17)

• EGMR, 29.06.2007 - 15809/02

  Recht auf ein faires Verfahren und Selbstbelastungsfreiheit (Kriterien für eine …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.06.2018 - 20556/10

  It may thus be defined as "the official notification given to an individual by the competent authority of an allegation that he has committed a criminal offence", a definition that also corresponds to the test whether "the situation of the [suspect] has been substantially affected" (see Eckle v. Germany, 15 July 1982, § 73, Series A no. 51 and O'Halloran and Francis v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 15809/02 and 25624/02, § 35, ECHR 2007).
• EGMR, 28.04.2005 - 72758/01

  Unschuldsvermutung (Entschädigungsansprüche; konkludente Schuldfeststellung bei …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.06.2018 - 20556/10

  The Court reiterates that the presumption of innocence enshrined in Article 6 § 2 will be violated if a judicial decision concerning a person charged with a criminal offence reflects an opinion that he is guilty before he has been proved guilty according to law (see, inter alia, Allenet de Ribemont v. France, no. 15175/89, § 35, Series A no. 308; Daktaras v. Lithuania, no. 42095/98, § 41, ECHR 2000-X; A.L. v. Germany, no. 72758/01, § 31, 28 April 2005; and Caraian v. Romania, no. 34456/07, § 74, 23 June 2015).
• EGMR, 11.01.2007 - 20027/02

  Menschenrechte: Überlange Verfahrensdauer eines Zivilrechtsstreits

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.06.2018 - 20556/10

  In that respect, the Court reiterates that, as a general rule, the assessment of the facts and the taking of evidence and its evaluation is a matter which necessarily comes within the appreciation of the national courts and cannot be reviewed by the Court unless there is an indication that the judges have drawn grossly unfair or arbitrary conclusions from the facts before them (see García Ruiz v. Spain [GC], no. 30544/96, § 28, ECHR 1999-I, Herbst v. Germany, no. 20027/02, § 83, 11 January 2007; and, mutatis mutandis, Tamminen v. Finland, no. 40847/98, § 38, 15 June 2004).

 
• EGMR, 27.10.1993 - 14448/88

  DOMBO BEHEER B.V. v. THE NETHERLANDS

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.06.2018 - 20556/10

  Instead, the applicant's complaint as to the fairness of the labour proceedings falls to be examined under the general right to fair trial as provided for by Article 6 § 1 (see ibid., with references to Dombo Beheer B.V. v. the Netherlands, 27 October 1993, §§ 30-35, Series A no. 274).
• EGMR, 15.07.1982 - 8130/78

  Eckle ./. Deutschland

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.06.2018 - 20556/10

  It may thus be defined as "the official notification given to an individual by the competent authority of an allegation that he has committed a criminal offence", a definition that also corresponds to the test whether "the situation of the [suspect] has been substantially affected" (see Eckle v. Germany, 15 July 1982, § 73, Series A no. 51 and O'Halloran and Francis v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 15809/02 and 25624/02, § 35, ECHR 2007).
• EGMR, 10.02.1995 - 15175/89

  ALLENET DE RIBEMONT c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.06.2018 - 20556/10

  The Court reiterates that the presumption of innocence enshrined in Article 6 § 2 will be violated if a judicial decision concerning a person charged with a criminal offence reflects an opinion that he is guilty before he has been proved guilty according to law (see, inter alia, Allenet de Ribemont v. France, no. 15175/89, § 35, Series A no. 308; Daktaras v. Lithuania, no. 42095/98, § 41, ECHR 2000-X; A.L. v. Germany, no. 72758/01, § 31, 28 April 2005; and Caraian v. Romania, no. 34456/07, § 74, 23 June 2015).
• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 32842/96

  NUUTINEN v. FINLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.06.2018 - 20556/10

  In that connection, the Court recalls that a delay at some stage may be tolerated if the overall duration of the proceedings cannot be deemed excessive (see Nuutinen v. Finland, no. 32842/96, § 110, ECHR 2000-VIII).
• EGMR, 22.03.2001 - 34044/96

  Schießbefehl

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.06.2018 - 20556/10

  Moreover, it is primarily for the national authorities, notably the courts, to interpret and apply domestic law (see, among many others, Streletz, Kessler and Krenz v. Germany [GC], no. 34044/96, 35532/97 and 44801/98, § 49, ECHR 2001-II).
• EGMR, 31.08.2010 - 3675/07

  CALIK c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.06.2018 - 20556/10

  The Court notes that it has already examined and dismissed similar complaints in previous cases against Turkey concerning the length of labour proceedings (see Çalik v. Turkey (dec.), no. 3675/07, 31 August 2010; Dildirim v. Turkey (dec.), no. 42927/10 and 14 other applications, §§ 43-45, 12 March 2013; Yigit v. Turkey (dec.), no. 24032/09 and 21 other applications, §§ 43-45, 16 December 2014; and Akça v. Turkey (dec.), no. 17997/10, 22 November 2016).
• EGMR, 29.06.2007 - 25624/02

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.06.2018 - 20556/10

  It may thus be defined as "the official notification given to an individual by the competent authority of an allegation that he has committed a criminal offence", a definition that also corresponds to the test whether "the situation of the [suspect] has been substantially affected" (see Eckle v. Germany, 15 July 1982, § 73, Series A no. 51 and O'Halloran and Francis v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 15809/02 and 25624/02, § 35, ECHR 2007).
• EGMR, 12.03.2013 - 42927/10

  DILDIRIM AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
• EGMR, 12.07.2013 - 25424/09

  ALLEN c. ROYAUME-UNI
• EGMR, 16.12.2014 - 24032/09

  YIGIT ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 28.03.2017 - 45028/07

  KEMAL COSKUN v. TURKEY
• EGMR, 22.11.2016 - 17997/10

  AKÇA v. TURKEY
• EGMR, 11.07.2017 - 19867/12

  MOREIRA FERREIRA v. PORTUGAL (No. 2)
• EGMR, 13.09.2016 - 50541/08

  Aufschub des Rechts auf Verteidigerbeistand (Recht auf ein faires Verfahren; …