Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 19.07.2011 - 26000/02 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2011,56487) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
L.M. v. LATVIA
Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. e, Art. 41 MRK
Violation of Art. 5-1 Non-pecuniary damage - award (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
[FRE]
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 19.07.2011 - 26000/02
- EGMR, 05.07.2017 - 26000/02
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 05.10.2004 - 45508/99
H.L. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 19.07.2011 - 26000/02
It also refers to the quality of the law, requiring it to be compatible with the rule of law, a concept inherent in all the Articles of the Convention (see, amongst other authorities, Kafkaris v. Cyprus [GC], no. 21906/04, § 116, ECHR 2008-...) In this connection the Court has stated that Article 5 § 1, although cumulative with the protection guaranteed under Article 5 § 4, strictly regulates the circumstance in which one's liberty can be taken away (see H.L. v. the United Kingdom, no. 45508/99, § 113, ECHR 2004-IX). - EGMR, 16.06.2005 - 61603/00
Konventionskonforme Auslegung des deutschen (Zivil-)Rechts …
Auszug aus EGMR, 19.07.2011 - 26000/02
Before determining whether the applicant has been reliably shown to have been suffering from a mental disorder of a kind or degree warranting compulsory confinement throughout her detention (see Winterwerp, cited above), the Court must establish whether the applicant's detention was carried out "in accordance with a procedure prescribed by law" and "lawful" within the meaning of Article 5 § 1 (e) (see Storck v. Germany, no. 61603/00, § 112, ECHR 2005-V). - EGMR, 12.02.2008 - 21906/04
KAFKARIS c. CHYPRE
Auszug aus EGMR, 19.07.2011 - 26000/02
It also refers to the quality of the law, requiring it to be compatible with the rule of law, a concept inherent in all the Articles of the Convention (see, amongst other authorities, Kafkaris v. Cyprus [GC], no. 21906/04, § 116, ECHR 2008-...) In this connection the Court has stated that Article 5 § 1, although cumulative with the protection guaranteed under Article 5 § 4, strictly regulates the circumstance in which one's liberty can be taken away (see H.L. v. the United Kingdom, no. 45508/99, § 113, ECHR 2004-IX). - EGMR, 04.04.2000 - 26629/95
WITOLD LITWA c. POLOGNE
Auszug aus EGMR, 19.07.2011 - 26000/02
More specifically, in order to fulfil the purpose of Article 5 § 1, which is to prevent persons from being deprived of their liberty in an arbitrary fashion (see Witold Litwa v. Poland, no. 26629/95, §§ 72-73, ECHR 2000-III), the domestic law must provide adequate legal protection and "fair and proper procedures" (see Winterwerp, cited above, §§ 19-20, and, more recently, H.L., cited above, § 115). - EGMR, 24.10.1979 - 6301/73
WINTERWERP v. THE NETHERLANDS
Auszug aus EGMR, 19.07.2011 - 26000/02
The Government also maintained that the national authorities had guaranteed the observance of the necessary conditions of detention, which were set out in the judgment Winterwerp v. the Netherlands, 24 October 1979, Series A no. 33.