Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 19.07.2018 - 39701/11 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2018,21026) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
KIRJANENKO v. LATVIA
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings;Article 6-1 - Reasonable time) (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 19.07.2018 - 39701/11
- EGMR, 25.09.2019 - 39701/11
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96
FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 19.07.2018 - 39701/11
The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII). - EGMR, 18.02.2009 - 55707/00
Andrejeva ./. Lettland
Auszug aus EGMR, 19.07.2018 - 39701/11
Furthermore, they are only recoverable in so far as they relate to the violation found (see, among many other authorities, Andrejeva v. Latvia [GC], no. 55707/00, § 115, ECHR 2009). - EGMR, 19.04.2007 - 63235/00
VILHO ESKELINEN AND OTHERS v. FINLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 19.07.2018 - 39701/11
In this case the Court considers that the period to be taken into consideration began on 9 November 2001, as the application to the Commission was a prerequisite for bringing the proceedings to the court (see mutatis mutandis König v. Germany, 28 June 1978, § 98, Series A no. 27, and Vilho Eskelinen and Others v. Finland [GC], no. 63235/00, §§ 65-66, ECHR 2007-II). - EGMR, 28.06.1978 - 6232/73
König ./. Deutschland
Auszug aus EGMR, 19.07.2018 - 39701/11
In this case the Court considers that the period to be taken into consideration began on 9 November 2001, as the application to the Commission was a prerequisite for bringing the proceedings to the court (see mutatis mutandis König v. Germany, 28 June 1978, § 98, Series A no. 27, and Vilho Eskelinen and Others v. Finland [GC], no. 63235/00, §§ 65-66, ECHR 2007-II). - EGMR, 21.02.1975 - 4451/70
GOLDER c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 19.07.2018 - 39701/11
The Court reiterates that in civil matters the reasonable time may begin to run, in some circumstances, even before the issue of the writ commencing proceedings before the court to which the plaintiff submits the dispute (see Golder v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1975, § 32, Series A no. 18).