Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 19.07.2018 - 60561/14, 35252/08, 59549/12, 16870/11, 16874/11, 16879/11, 22008/12, 14000/12, 18116/15, 7077/06, 35973/07, 7814/08, 25724/08, 49087/08, 61400/11, 70401/11, 5375/12, 10447/12, 30658/13, 63531/13, 2838/14, 7442/15, 74087/10, 15410/11, 72789/12, 5359/13, 3 |
Volltextveröffentlichungen (3)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
S.M. v. CROATIA
Violation of Article 4 - Prohibition of slavery and forced labour (Article 4-1 - Trafficking in human beings);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction) (englisch)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
S.M. v. CROATIA - [Deutsche Übersetzung] Zusammenfassung durch das Österreichische Institut für Menschenrechte (ÖIM)
[DEU] Violation of Article 4 - Prohibition of slavery and forced labour (Article 4 - Positive obligations;Effective investigation;Article 4-1 - Trafficking in human beings);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction) ...
- juris(Abodienst) (Volltext/Leitsatz)
Besprechungen u.ä.
- HRR Strafrecht (Entscheidungsbesprechung)
Erfasst Art. 4 EMRK auch die Zwangsprostitution?
Sonstiges (4)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
S.M. v. CROATIA
Art. 3, Art. 4, Art. 4 Abs. 1, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1 MRK
[ENG] - Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Sonstiges)
Décisions du collège de la Grande Chambre - décembre 2018
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Sonstiges)
Grand Chamber Panel's decisions - December 2018
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Videoaufzeichnung der mündlichen Verhandlung)
S.M. v. Croatia
[15.05.2019]
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 19.07.2018 - 60561/14, 35252/08, 59549/12, 16870/11, 16874/11, 16879/11, 22008/12, 14000/12, 18116/15, 7077/06, 35973/07, 7814/08, 25724/08, 49087/08, 61400/11, 70401/11, 5375/12, 10447/12, 30658/13, 63531/13, 2838/14, 7442/15, 74087/10, 15410/11, 72789/12, 5359/13, 3
- EGMR, 25.06.2020 - 60561/14
Wird zitiert von ... Neu Zitiert selbst (9)
- EGMR, 04.12.2003 - 39272/98
M.C. c. BULGARIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 19.07.2018 - 60561/14
In these cases like in cases concerning acts such as rape and sexual abuse fundamental values, human dignity and essential aspects of private life are at stake (see X and Y v. the Netherlands, 26 March 1985, § 27, Series A no 91 and M.C. v. Bulgaria, no. 39272/98, § 150, ECHR 2003-XII).It is well established that States have a positive obligation inherent in both Articles 3 and 4 of the Convention to enact criminal-law provisions effectively punishing serious acts prohibited under those provisions, even where they are not committed by State agents but by private individuals, and to apply them in practice through effective investigation and prosecution (see M.C. v. Bulgaria, no. 39272/98, § 153, ECHR 2003-XII, and L.E. v. Greece, no. 71545/12, §§ 65 and 68, 21 January 2016).
- EGMR, 02.11.2010 - 38281/08
MATASARU AND SAVITCHI v. MOLDOVA
Auszug aus EGMR, 19.07.2018 - 60561/14
Consideration has been given in the Court's judgments to matters such as the opening of investigations, delays in identifying witnesses or taking statements (see Matasaru and Savitchi v. Moldova, no. 38281/08, §§ 88 and 93, 2 November 2010), the length of time taken for the initial investigation (see Indelicato v. Italy, no. 31143/96, § 37, 18 October 2001), and unjustified protraction of the criminal proceedings resulting in the expiry of the statute of limitations (see Angelova and Iliev v. Bulgaria, no. 55523/00, §§ 101-03, 26 July 2007). - EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95
LABITA c. ITALIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 19.07.2018 - 60561/14
The promptness of the authorities" reaction to the complaints is an important factor (see Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, §§ 133 et seq., ECHR 2000-IV).
- EGMR, 17.10.2006 - 52067/99
OKKALI c. TURQUIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 19.07.2018 - 60561/14
The important point for the Court to review is whether and to what extent the prosecuting authorities in taking their actions and the courts in reaching their conclusion may be deemed to have submitted the case to the careful scrutiny required by Article 4 of the Convention, so that the deterrent effect of the criminal-law system in place and the significance of the role it is required to play in preventing violations of the rights protected under Article 4 of the Convention are not undermined (see, mutatis mutandis, Okkali v. Turkey, no. 52067/99, § 66, ECHR 2006-XII (extracts)). - EGMR, 17.01.2017 - 58216/12
Ausreichende Untersuchung von Anschuldigungen von Menschenhandel
Auszug aus EGMR, 19.07.2018 - 60561/14
The identified elements of trafficking - the treatment of human beings as commodities, close surveillance, the circumscription of movement, the use of violence and threats, poor living and working conditions, and little or no payment - cut across these three categories (see Rantsev, cited above, §§ 279-82; see also J. and Others v. Austria, no. 58216/12, § 104, ECHR 2017 (extracts). - EGMR, 18.10.2001 - 31143/96
INDELICATO c. ITALIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 19.07.2018 - 60561/14
Consideration has been given in the Court's judgments to matters such as the opening of investigations, delays in identifying witnesses or taking statements (see Matasaru and Savitchi v. Moldova, no. 38281/08, §§ 88 and 93, 2 November 2010), the length of time taken for the initial investigation (see Indelicato v. Italy, no. 31143/96, § 37, 18 October 2001), and unjustified protraction of the criminal proceedings resulting in the expiry of the statute of limitations (see Angelova and Iliev v. Bulgaria, no. 55523/00, §§ 101-03, 26 July 2007). - EGMR, 26.07.2007 - 48254/99
COBZARU v. ROMANIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 19.07.2018 - 60561/14
Moreover, notwithstanding its subsidiary role in assessing evidence, the Court has held that where allegations are made under Article 3 of the Convention the Court must apply a particularly thorough scrutiny, even if certain domestic proceedings and investigations have already taken place (see Cobzaru v. Romania, no. 48254/99, § 65, 26 July 2007). - EGMR, 20.03.2012 - 26692/05
C.A.S. AND C.S. v. ROMANIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 19.07.2018 - 60561/14
Concerning such serious acts, the State's positive obligation to safeguard the individual's physical integrity may also extend to questions relating to the effectiveness of the criminal investigation (see, for instance, Y. v. Slovenia, no. 41107/10, 28 May 2015 ) and to the possibility of obtaining reparation and redress (see C.A.S. and C.S. v. Romania, no. 26692/05, 20 March 2012). - EGMR, 28.05.2015 - 41107/10
Y. v. SLOVENIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 19.07.2018 - 60561/14
Concerning such serious acts, the State's positive obligation to safeguard the individual's physical integrity may also extend to questions relating to the effectiveness of the criminal investigation (see, for instance, Y. v. Slovenia, no. 41107/10, 28 May 2015 ) and to the possibility of obtaining reparation and redress (see C.A.S. and C.S. v. Romania, no. 26692/05, 20 March 2012).
- EGMR, 01.06.2021 - 62819/17
DENIS AND IRVINE v. BELGIUM
L"« affaire'renvoyée devant la Grande Chambre est la requête telle qu'elle a été déclarée recevable, à laquelle s'ajoutent les griefs qui n'ont pas été déclarés irrecevables (Ilias et Ahmed c. Hongrie [GC], no 47287/15, §§ 171-172 et 177, 21 novembre 2019, et S.M. c. Croatie [GC], no 60561/14, § 216, 25 juin 2020).