Volltextveröffentlichungen (4)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  VELINOV v. \

  Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. b, Art. 5 Abs. 2, Art. 5 Abs. 5, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 13+6 Abs. 1, Art. 35, Art. 41 MRK
  Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention Procedure prescribed by law Article 5-1-b - Non-compliance with court order) Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-2 ...

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  VELINOV v. \

  Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. b, Art. 5 Abs. 2, Art. 5 Abs. 5, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 13+6 Abs. 1, Art. 35, Art. 41 MRK
  [MKD] Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention Procedure prescribed by law Article 5-1-b - Non-compliance with court order) Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-2 ...

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  VELINOV v. \

  [ICE] Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention;Procedure prescribed by law;Article 5-1-b - Non-compliance with court order);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-2 ...

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  VELINOV v. \

  [TUR] Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention;Procedure prescribed by law;Article 5-1-b - Non-compliance with court order);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-2 ...

Sonstiges (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  Velinov v. "The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia"

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 19.09.2013 - 16880/08
• EGMR, 04.09.2019 - 16880/08

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (7)

• EGMR, 19.06.2012 - 36937/06

  HAJNAL v. SERBIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.09.2013 - 16880/08

  That is to say, the applicant must have paid them, or be bound to pay them, pursuant to a legal or contractual obligation, and they must have been unavoidable in order to prevent the violation found or to obtain redress (see Belchev v. Bulgaria, no. 39270/98, § 113, 8 April 2004, and Hajnal v. Serbia, no. 36937/06, § 154, 19 June 2012).
• EGMR, 18.05.2004 - 58148/00

  ÉDITIONS PLON c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.09.2013 - 16880/08

  According to the Court's case-law, an applicant is entitled to the reimbursement of costs and expenses only in so far as it has been shown that these have been actually and necessarily incurred and are reasonable as to quantum (see Editions Plon v. France, no. 58148/00, § 64, ECHR 2004-IV).
• EGMR, 24.10.1979 - 6301/73

  WINTERWERP v. THE NETHERLANDS

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.09.2013 - 16880/08

  The Court recalls that "lawfulness" is required in respect of both the ordering and the execution of measures involving deprivation of liberty (see, mutatis mutandis, Winterwerp v. the Netherlands, 24 October 1979, § 39, Series A no. 33).

 
• EGMR, 14.06.2011 - 28221/08

  GATT v. MALTA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.09.2013 - 16880/08

  A period of detention will in principle be lawful if it is carried out pursuant to a court order (see Witold Litwa v. Poland, no. 26629/95, §§ 72 and 73, ECHR 2000-III; and Gatt v. Malta, no. 28221/08, § 40, ECHR 2010).
• EGMR, 08.04.2004 - 39270/98

  BELCHEV v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.09.2013 - 16880/08

  That is to say, the applicant must have paid them, or be bound to pay them, pursuant to a legal or contractual obligation, and they must have been unavoidable in order to prevent the violation found or to obtain redress (see Belchev v. Bulgaria, no. 39270/98, § 113, 8 April 2004, and Hajnal v. Serbia, no. 36937/06, § 154, 19 June 2012).
• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96

  FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.09.2013 - 16880/08

  The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities, and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII).
• EGMR, 04.04.2000 - 26629/95

  WITOLD LITWA c. POLOGNE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.09.2013 - 16880/08

  A period of detention will in principle be lawful if it is carried out pursuant to a court order (see Witold Litwa v. Poland, no. 26629/95, §§ 72 and 73, ECHR 2000-III; and Gatt v. Malta, no. 28221/08, § 40, ECHR 2010).