Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 19.09.2017 - 52168/12 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2017,62645) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
ZURASHVILI v. GEORGIA
Struck out of the list (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 18.09.2007 - 28953/03
SULWINSKA v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 19.09.2017 - 52168/12
To this end, the Court has examined the declaration in the light of the principles established in its case-law (see, in particular, Tahsin Acar v. Turkey (preliminary objections) [GC], no. 26307/95, §§ 75-77, ECHR 2003-VI; WAZA Sp. z o.o. v. Poland (dec.), no. 11602/02, 26 June 2007, and Sulwinska v. Poland (dec.), no. 28953/03, 18 September 2007). - EGMR, 21.04.2015 - 72874/01
UNION OF JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 19.09.2017 - 52168/12
The general principles governing reimbursement of costs under Rule 43 § 4 are essentially the same as under Article 41 of the Convention (see, among others, Pisano v. Italy (striking out) [GC], no. 36732/97, §§ 53-54, 24 October 2002, and also Union of Jehovah's Witnesses and Others v. Georgia (dec.), no. 72874/01, §§ 33 and 34, 21 April 2015). - EGMR, 24.10.2002 - 36732/97
PISANO c. ITALIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 19.09.2017 - 52168/12
The general principles governing reimbursement of costs under Rule 43 § 4 are essentially the same as under Article 41 of the Convention (see, among others, Pisano v. Italy (striking out) [GC], no. 36732/97, §§ 53-54, 24 October 2002, and also Union of Jehovah's Witnesses and Others v. Georgia (dec.), no. 72874/01, §§ 33 and 34, 21 April 2015).