Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 19.10.2004 - 57467/00 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2004,54350) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
LIPOWICZ v. POLAND
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
Violation of Art. 6-1 Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed Non-pecuniary damage - financial award (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 06.05.2003 - 57467/00
- EGMR, 19.10.2004 - 57467/00
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96
FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 19.10.2004 - 57467/00
The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the criteria established by its case-law, particularly the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and of the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII, Humen v. Poland [GC], § 60 GC], no. 26614/95, 15 October 1999, § 60). - EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96
Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in …
Auszug aus EGMR, 19.10.2004 - 57467/00
Consequently, there is no justification for making any award to him under that head (see, mutatis mutandis, Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 164, ECHR 2000-XI). - EGMR, 28.06.1990 - 11761/85
Obermeier ./. Österreich
Auszug aus EGMR, 19.10.2004 - 57467/00
In this respect the Court reiterates that an employee who considers that he or she has been wrongly suspended or dismissed by his employer has an important personal interest in securing a judicial decision on the lawfulness of that measure promptly, employment disputes by their nature calling for expeditious decision, in view of what is at stake for the person concerned, who through dismissal loses his means of subsistence (see, among other authorities, the Obermeier v. Austria judgment of 28 June 1990, Series A no. 179, pp. 23-24, § 72, and the Caleffi v. Italy judgment of 24 May 1991, Series A no. 206-B, p. 20, § 17).