Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 19.10.2017 - 60873/09 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2017,39548) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
VANCHEV v. BULGARIA
Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Access to court);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary ...
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
VANCHEV v. BULGARIA
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 19.10.2017 - 60873/09
- EGMR, 04.06.2020 - 60873/09
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 21.02.1975 - 4451/70
GOLDER c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 19.10.2017 - 60873/09
Contracting States enjoy a certain margin of appreciation in that respect but the ultimate decision as to the observance of the Convention's requirements rests with the Court (see Golder v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1975, §§ 34-36, Series A no. 18). - EGMR, 17.12.2009 - 20075/03
SHILBERGS v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 19.10.2017 - 60873/09
The salient question is thus whether the compensation awarded to the applicant, which must be comparable to just satisfaction as provided for under Article 41 of the Convention (see, Scordino v. Italy (no. 1) [GC], no. 36813/97, § 181, ECHR 2006-V, and Shilbergs v. Russia, no. 20075/03, § 72, 17 December 2009), amounted to appropriate redress. - EGMR, 27.11.2008 - 28674/03
SLAVCHO KOSTOV v. BULGARIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 19.10.2017 - 60873/09
However, a decision or measure favourable to an applicant is not, in principle, sufficient to deprive him or her of the status of being a "victim" for the purposes of Article 34 of the Convention unless the national authorities have acknowledged, either expressly or in substance, and then afforded appropriate redress for the breach of the Convention (see, among others, Dalban v. Romania [GC], no. 28114/95, § 44, ECHR 1999-VI; Gäfgen v. Germany [GC], no. 22978/05, § 115, ECHR 2010; and Slavcho Kostov v. Bulgaria, no. 28674/03, § 41, 27 November 2008).