Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 19.10.2021 - 16101/18 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2021,46534) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
CAMILLERI v. MALTA
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (6)
- EGMR, 13.01.2000 - 45138/98
GEORGIOU v. GREECE
Auszug aus EGMR, 19.10.2021 - 16101/18
The Court refers to its general principles concerning the application of Article 3 of Protocol No. 7 as set out and put in practice in its case-law (see, inter alia, Poghosyan and Baghdasaryan v. Armenia, no. 22999/06, §§ 49 -52, ECHR 2012 and Matveyev v. Russia, no. 26601/02, §§ 39-45, 3 July 2008; as well as Soyupova v. Russia, (dec.), no. 37957/15, 19 April 2016; Bachowski v. Poland, (dec.), no. 32463/06, 2 November 2010; Jeronovics v. Latvia, (dec.), no. 547/02, § 77, 10 February 2009, and Georgiou v. Greece, (dec.), no. 45138/98). - EGMR, 19.04.2016 - 37957/15
SOYUPOVA v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 19.10.2021 - 16101/18
The Court refers to its general principles concerning the application of Article 3 of Protocol No. 7 as set out and put in practice in its case-law (see, inter alia, Poghosyan and Baghdasaryan v. Armenia, no. 22999/06, §§ 49 -52, ECHR 2012 and Matveyev v. Russia, no. 26601/02, §§ 39-45, 3 July 2008; as well as Soyupova v. Russia, (dec.), no. 37957/15, 19 April 2016; Bachowski v. Poland, (dec.), no. 32463/06, 2 November 2010; Jeronovics v. Latvia, (dec.), no. 547/02, § 77, 10 February 2009, and Georgiou v. Greece, (dec.), no. 45138/98). - EGMR, 27.04.1988 - 9659/82
BOYLE AND RICE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 19.10.2021 - 16101/18
According to the Court's case-law, Article 13 applies only where an individual has an "arguable claim" to be the victim of a violation of a Convention right (see Boyle and Rice v. the United Kingdom, 27 April 1988, § 52, Series A no. 131).
- EGMR, 02.11.2010 - 32463/06
BACHOWSKI v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 19.10.2021 - 16101/18
The Court refers to its general principles concerning the application of Article 3 of Protocol No. 7 as set out and put in practice in its case-law (see, inter alia, Poghosyan and Baghdasaryan v. Armenia, no. 22999/06, §§ 49 -52, ECHR 2012 and Matveyev v. Russia, no. 26601/02, §§ 39-45, 3 July 2008; as well as Soyupova v. Russia, (dec.), no. 37957/15, 19 April 2016; Bachowski v. Poland, (dec.), no. 32463/06, 2 November 2010; Jeronovics v. Latvia, (dec.), no. 547/02, § 77, 10 February 2009, and Georgiou v. Greece, (dec.), no. 45138/98). - EGMR, 12.07.2013 - 25424/09
ALLEN c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 19.10.2021 - 16101/18
Its references to the need to demonstrate innocence must now be considered to have been overtaken by the Court's intervening case-law on Article 6 § 2 (see Allen v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 25424/09, § 133, ECHR 2013). - EGMR, 12.06.2012 - 22999/06
POGHOSYAN ET BAGHDASARYAN c. ARMENIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 19.10.2021 - 16101/18
The Court refers to its general principles concerning the application of Article 3 of Protocol No. 7 as set out and put in practice in its case-law (see, inter alia, Poghosyan and Baghdasaryan v. Armenia, no. 22999/06, §§ 49 -52, ECHR 2012 and Matveyev v. Russia, no. 26601/02, §§ 39-45, 3 July 2008; as well as Soyupova v. Russia, (dec.), no. 37957/15, 19 April 2016; Bachowski v. Poland, (dec.), no. 32463/06, 2 November 2010; Jeronovics v. Latvia, (dec.), no. 547/02, § 77, 10 February 2009, and Georgiou v. Greece, (dec.), no. 45138/98).