Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  T.K. AND S.R. v. RUSSIA

  No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Extradition) (Conditional) (Kyrgyzstan) (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 19.11.2019 - 28492/15, 49975/15
• EGMR, 29.04.2022 - 28492/15
• EGMR - 28492/15 (anhängig)

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (4)

• EGMR, 23.10.2014 - 17239/13

  MAMAZHONOV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.11.2019 - 28492/15

  The relevant general principles concerning the application of Article 3 have been summarised recently by the Court in the judgments F.G. v. Sweden ([GC], no. 43611/11, §§ 111-27, ECHR 2016), and J.K. and Others v. Sweden ([GC], no. 59166/12, §§ 77-105, ECHR 2016); and, in the context of extraditions from Russia to Central Asian States, in Mamazhonov v. Russia (no.17239/13, §§ 127-35, 23 October 2014).

  See by contrast, Garayev v. Azerbaijan, no. 53688/08, § 71, 10 June 2010; Mamazhonov v. Russia no. 17239/13, § 141, 23 October 2014; and Ismoilov and Others v. Russia, no. 2947/06, § 121, 24 April 2008).".

• EGMR, 12.04.2005 - 36378/02

  CHAMAÏEV ET AUTRES c. GEORGIE ET RUSSIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.11.2019 - 28492/15

  In assessing whether there is a risk of ill-treatment in the requesting country, the Court assesses the general situation in that country, taking into account any indications of improvement or worsening of the human-rights situation in general or in respect of a particular group or area that might be relevant to the applicant's personal circumstances (see, mutatis mutandis, Shamayev and Others v. Georgia and Russia, no. 36378/02, § 337, ECHR 2005-III).
• EGMR, 28.05.1985 - 9214/80

  ABDULAZIZ, CABALES AND BALKANDALI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.11.2019 - 28492/15

  The Court reiterates at the outset that Contracting States have the right, as a matter of international law and subject to their treaty obligations, including the Convention, to control the entry, residence and expulsion of aliens (see Abdulaziz, Cabales and Balkandali v. the United Kingdom, 28 May 1985, § 67, Series A no. 94).
• EGMR, 07.07.1989 - 14038/88

  Jens Söring

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.11.2019 - 28492/15

  However, it is the Court's settled case-law that expulsion or extradition by a Contracting State may give rise to an issue under Article 3, and hence engage the responsibility of that State under the Convention, where substantial grounds have been shown for believing that the individual concerned, if deported, faces a real risk of being subjected to treatment contrary to Article 3 (see Saadi v. Italy [GC], no. 37201/06, § 125, ECHR 2008, and Soering v. the United Kingdom, 7 July 1989, § 91, Series A no. 161).

• Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 27.02.2020 - C-897/19

  Ruska Federacija

  135 Vgl. z. B. EGMR, 19. November 2019, TK und SR/Russland (ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1119JUD002849215, §§ 78, 91 bis 96).