Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 19.11.2019 - 39273/07 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2019,47956) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
MAN AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
Inadmissible (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 19.11.2019 - 39273/07
- EGMR - 39273/07
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 17.07.2014 - 47848/08
CENTRE FOR LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN CÂMPEANU v. ROMANIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 19.11.2019 - 39273/07
Articles 275 to 2781 of the CCP set out the procedure for any person wanting to challenge any of the measures or decisions taken during a criminal investigation, in the event that these had harmed his or her legitimate interests (see, for instance, Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, § 50, ECHR 2014). - EGMR, 18.04.2013 - 26419/10
SAINT-PAUL LUXEMBOURG S.A. c. LUXEMBOURG
Auszug aus EGMR, 19.11.2019 - 39273/07
In line with its case-law on the matter, the Court considers that there has been an interference with the applicants" right to respect for their home in the present case (see, for instance and mutatis mutandis, Saint-Paul Luxembourg S.A. v. Luxembourg, no. 26419/10, § 39, 18 April 2013, and Wieser and Bicos Beteiligungen GmbH v. Austria, no. 74336/01, § 43, ECHR 2007-IV). - EGMR, 02.08.1984 - 8691/79
MALONE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 19.11.2019 - 39273/07
The Court points out that telephone conversations are covered by the notions of "private life" and "correspondence" within the meaning of Article 8 (see, among other authorities, Malone v. the United Kingdom, 2 August 1984, § 64, Series A no. 82; Kruslin v. France, 24 April 1990, § 26, Series A no. 176-A; and Kopp v. Switzerland, 25 March 1998, § 53, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-II). - EGMR, 24.04.1990 - 11801/85
KRUSLIN c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 19.11.2019 - 39273/07
The Court points out that telephone conversations are covered by the notions of "private life" and "correspondence" within the meaning of Article 8 (see, among other authorities, Malone v. the United Kingdom, 2 August 1984, § 64, Series A no. 82; Kruslin v. France, 24 April 1990, § 26, Series A no. 176-A; and Kopp v. Switzerland, 25 March 1998, § 53, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-II).