Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 20.01.2004 - 73270/01 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2004,46086) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
PIHLAK v. ESTONIA
Art. 3, Art. 13, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 3 MRK
Partly admissible Partly inadmissible (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 20.01.2004 - 73270/01
- EGMR, 21.06.2005 - 73270/01
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96
Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in …
Auszug aus EGMR, 20.01.2004 - 73270/01
Nevertheless, under this provision the State must ensure that a person is detained in conditions which are compatible with respect for his human dignity, that the manner and method of the execution of the measure do not subject him to distress or hardship of an intensity exceeding the unavoidable level of suffering inherent in detention and that, given the practical demands of imprisonment, his health and well-being are adequately secured (see Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 92-94, ECHR 2000-XI). - EGMR, 27.08.1992 - 12850/87
TOMASI c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 20.01.2004 - 73270/01
Paragraph 3 of Article 5 of the Convention covers the former and paragraph 5 of Article 5 the latter (see YaÄ?ci and Sargin v. Turkey, judgment of 8 June 1995, Series A no. 319-A, § 44, and Tomasi v. France, judgment of 28 July 1992, Series A no. 241-A, § 79). - EGMR, 08.06.1995 - 16419/90
YAGCI AND SARGIN v. TURKEY
Auszug aus EGMR, 20.01.2004 - 73270/01
Paragraph 3 of Article 5 of the Convention covers the former and paragraph 5 of Article 5 the latter (see YaÄ?ci and Sargin v. Turkey, judgment of 8 June 1995, Series A no. 319-A, § 44, and Tomasi v. France, judgment of 28 July 1992, Series A no. 241-A, § 79).