Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 20.01.2009 - 26766/05, 22228/06 |
Volltextveröffentlichungen (3)
- HRR Strafrecht
Art. 6 Abs. 1 Satz 1, Abs. 3 lit. d EMRK; Art. 2 Abs. 1 GG; Art. 20 Abs. 3 GG; § 240 StPO; § 244 Abs. 2 StPO; § 251 StPO; § 250 StPO; § 261 StPO
Recht auf Konfrontation und Befragung von Mitangeklagten als Zeugen im Sinne der EMRK; Recht auf ein faires Verfahren (gesetzlicher Schuldbeweis; Verbot der Verwertung als entscheidendes oder einziges Beweismittel; besonders vorsichtige Beweiswürdigung; Zeugenbegriff; ... - Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
AL-KHAWAJA ET TAHERY c. ROYAUME-UNI
(französisch)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
AL-KHAWAJA AND TAHERY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
(englisch)
Besprechungen u.ä.
- HRR Strafrecht (Aufsatz mit Bezug zur Entscheidung)
"Nie sollst du mich befragen" - Zur Behandlung des Rechts zur Konfrontation mitbeschuldigter Belastungszeugen (Art. 6 Abs. 3 lit. d EMRK) durch den BGH (Jan Dehne-Niemann; HRRS 4/2010, S. 189)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 20.01.2009 - 26766/05, 22228/06
- EGMR, 15.12.2011 - 26766/05
- EGMR, 06.12.2012 - 26766/05
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 24.11.1986 - 9120/80
UNTERPERTINGER v. AUSTRIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 20.01.2009 - 26766/05
Hence, in Unterpertinger v. Austria, 24 November 1986, Series A no. 110 the Court held that the reading out of statements of witnesses without the witness being heard in a public hearing could not be regarded as being inconsistent with Article 6 §§ 1 and 3(d) of the Convention but it went on to emphasise that the use made of this in evidence had nevertheless to comply with the rights of the defence which it was the object and purpose of Article 6 to protect. - EGMR, 02.07.2002 - 34209/96
S.N. v. SWEDEN
Auszug aus EGMR, 20.01.2009 - 26766/05
Relying on S.N. v. Sweden, no. 34209/96, ECHR 2002?V, the Government argued there was no absolute rule that a conviction could not be based solely or to a decisive extent on evidence given by an absent or anonymous witness. - EGMR, 06.12.1988 - 10588/83
BARBERÀ, MESSEGUÉ AND JABARDO v. SPAIN
Auszug aus EGMR, 20.01.2009 - 26766/05
As minimum rights, the provisions of Article 6 § 3 constitute express guarantees and cannot be read, as it was by the Court of Appeal in Sellick (see paragraph 25 above), as illustrations of matters to be taken into account when considering whether a fair trial has been held (see Barberà, Messegué and Jabardo v. Spain, 6 December 1988, §§ 67 and 68, Series A no. 146; Kostovski v. the Netherlands, 20 November 1989, § 39, Series A no. 166). - EGMR, 20.11.1989 - 11454/85
KOSTOVSKI v. THE NETHERLANDS
Auszug aus EGMR, 20.01.2009 - 26766/05
As minimum rights, the provisions of Article 6 § 3 constitute express guarantees and cannot be read, as it was by the Court of Appeal in Sellick (see paragraph 25 above), as illustrations of matters to be taken into account when considering whether a fair trial has been held (see Barberà, Messegué and Jabardo v. Spain, 6 December 1988, §§ 67 and 68, Series A no. 146; Kostovski v. the Netherlands, 20 November 1989, § 39, Series A no. 166). - EGMR, 15.06.1992 - 12433/86
LÜDI v. SWITZERLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 20.01.2009 - 26766/05
These categories are not mutually exclusive, since witnesses may be both anonymous and absent (see for example, Lüdi v. Switzerland, 15 June 1992, Series A no. 238; and Van Mechelen and Others v. the Netherlands, 23 April 1997, Reports 1997?III).