Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 20.01.2011 - 27889/03 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2011,55957) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
BOLDYREV v. UKRAINE
Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 3, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1 MRK
Violation of Art. 5-3 Violation of Art. 6-1 (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 25.03.1999 - 25444/94
PÉLISSIER AND SASSI v. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 20.01.2011 - 27889/03
The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities (see, among many other authorities, Pélissier and Sassi v. France [GC], no. 25444/94, § 67, ECHR 1999-II). - EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96
Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in …
Auszug aus EGMR, 20.01.2011 - 27889/03
As from that date he was detained "after conviction by a competent court", within the meaning of Article 5 § 1 (a) and, consequently, that period of his detention falls outside the scope of Article 5 § 3 (cf. Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 104, ECHR 2000-XI). - EGMR, 24.07.2003 - 46133/99
SMIRNOVA c. RUSSIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 20.01.2011 - 27889/03
The period during which the applicant was on the run (18 November 1998 to 21 October 1999) should be excluded from the overall length of the proceedings (see Girolami v. Italy, judgment of 19 February 1991, Series A no. 196-E, § 13, and Smirnova v. Russia, nos. 46133/99 and 48183/99, § 81, ECHR 2003-IX). - EGMR, 02.03.2006 - 55669/00
NAKHMANOVICH v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 20.01.2011 - 27889/03
In this respect the Court recalls that an accused in criminal proceedings should be entitled to have his or her case conducted with special diligence and Article 6 is, in criminal matters, designed to ensure that a person who has been charged does not remain for too long in a state of uncertainty about his or her fate (see Nakhmanovich v. Russia, no. 55669/00, § 89, 2 March 2006). - EGMR, 10.11.1969 - 1602/62
Stögmüller ./. Österreich
Auszug aus EGMR, 20.01.2011 - 27889/03
The Court reiterates that it is necessary, when examining the question whether Article 5 § 3 has been observed, to consider and assess the reasonableness of the grounds which persuaded the judicial authorities to decide, in the case brought before the Court, on this serious departure from the rules of respect for individual liberty and of the presumption of innocence which is involved in every detention without a conviction (see Stogmüller v. Austria, judgment of 10 November 1969, Series A no. 9, § 4).