Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 20.01.2015 - 21762/14 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2015,1562) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
TUKHTAMURODOV v. RUSSIA
Wird zitiert von ... (2) Neu Zitiert selbst (1)
- EGMR, 07.07.1989 - 14038/88
Jens Söring
Auszug aus EGMR, 20.01.2015 - 21762/14
The Court reiterates that expulsion by a Contracting State may give rise to an issue under Article 3, and hence engage the responsibility of that State under the Convention, where substantial grounds have been shown for believing that the individual concerned, if deported, faces a real risk of being subjected to treatment contrary to Article 3 (see Saadi v. Italy [GC], no. 37201/06, § 125, ECHR 2008, and Soering v. the United Kingdom, 7 July 1989, § 91, Series A no. 161).
- EGMR - 53980/15 (anhängig)
H.R. v. RUSSIA
For instance, as to the temporary asylum procedure, was the assessment of the applicant's situation based on sufficiently clear and foreseeable criteria that are wide enough to deal properly with the substance on an issue under Article 2 or 3 of the Convention? Did/does any specific provision of the Refugees Act or other legislation provide that a pending application for temporary asylum and a pending judicial review in respect of a refusal to grant such asylum each have an "automatic suspensive effect" vis-à-vis a final expulsion order (see Savriddin Dzhurayev v. Russia, no. 71386/10, § 31, ECHR 2013; Tukhtamurodov v. Russia (dec.), no. 21762/14, 20 January 2015, §§ 24-27; Khamrakulov v. Russia, no. 68894/13, § 61, 16 April 2015; and L.M. and Others, cited above, §§ 67 and 100)? Do the absence of such an effect, the narrow scope of assessment, and the temporary nature of the solution arising from a refusal to grant temporary asylum make this remedy ineffective/not appropriate to be used before lodging an application before the Court?. - EGMR, 05.06.2018 - 40314/16
A.A. v. RUSSIA
The Court reiterates that, in principle, a successful application for temporary asylum would be capable of suspending the enforcement of administrative removal (see S.K. v. Russia, cited above, § 94, and Tukhtamurodov v. Russia (dec.), no. 21762/14, 20 January 2015).