Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 20.02.2018 - 60715/14 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2018,20504) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
AS DAGBLADET v. NORWAY
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 20.05.1999 - 21980/93
BLADET TROMSØ ET STENSAAS c. NORVEGE
Auszug aus EGMR, 20.02.2018 - 60715/14
Reference was made to several cases, including Delfi AS v Estonia, no. 64569/09, § 81, 10 October 2013 (see, now, Delfi AS v. Estonia [GC], no. 64569/09, § 138, ECHR 2015) (the balancing between Articles 8 and 10 of the Convention); Bergens Tidende and Others v. Norway, no. 26132/95, §§ 48-49, ECHR 2000-IV; Bladet Tromsø and Stensaas v. Norway [GC], no. 21980/93, § 65, ECHR 1999-III (journalists must report on issues of general interest in good faith in order to provide accurate and reliable information in accordance with the ethics of journalism), and Lingens v. Austria, 8 July 1986, § 46, Series A no. 103 (the distinction between statements of facts and value judgments). - EGMR, 02.05.2000 - 26132/95
BERGENS TIDENDE ET AUTRES c. NORVEGE
Auszug aus EGMR, 20.02.2018 - 60715/14
Reference was made to several cases, including Delfi AS v Estonia, no. 64569/09, § 81, 10 October 2013 (see, now, Delfi AS v. Estonia [GC], no. 64569/09, § 138, ECHR 2015) (the balancing between Articles 8 and 10 of the Convention); Bergens Tidende and Others v. Norway, no. 26132/95, §§ 48-49, ECHR 2000-IV; Bladet Tromsø and Stensaas v. Norway [GC], no. 21980/93, § 65, ECHR 1999-III (journalists must report on issues of general interest in good faith in order to provide accurate and reliable information in accordance with the ethics of journalism), and Lingens v. Austria, 8 July 1986, § 46, Series A no. 103 (the distinction between statements of facts and value judgments). - EGMR, 22.10.2007 - 21279/02
LINDON, OTCHAKOVSKY-LAURENS ET JULY c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 20.02.2018 - 60715/14
However, according to the Court's case-law, as also observed by the Supreme Court, "even where a statement amounts to a value judgment, there must exist a sufficient factual basis to support it, failing which it will be excessive" (see, for example, Lindon, Otchakovsky-Laurens and July v. France [GC], nos. 21279/02 and 36448/02, § 55, ECHR 2007-IV). - EGMR, 07.02.2012 - 40660/08
Caroline von Hannover kann keine Untersagung von Bildveröffentlichungen über sie …
Auszug aus EGMR, 20.02.2018 - 60715/14
40660/08 and 60641/08, §§ 108-113, ECHR 2012).