Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  Y v. BULGARIA

  Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation;Positive obligations) (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  Y v. BULGARIA

  Art. 3, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (7)Neu Zitiert selbst (18)

• EGMR, 10.10.2006 - 7508/02

  L.L. c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.02.2020 - 41990/18

  She thus raised before the national authorities, in substance, the grievance which she has submitted to the Court (see, mutatis mutandis, Glasenapp v. Germany, 28 August 1986, § 44, Series A no. 104; Fressoz and Roire v. France [GC], no. 29183/95, §§ 38-39, ECHR 1999-I; and L.L. v. France, no. 7508/02, § 23, ECHR 2006-XI).
• EGMR, 15.01.2015 - 3400/07

  M.A. v. SLOVENIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.02.2020 - 41990/18

  It is settled that rape and serious sexual assault amount to treatment falling within the ambit of Article 3 of the Convention (see Aydin v. Turkey, 25 September 1997, § 83, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-VI, and Maslova and Nalbandov v. Russia, no. 839/02, § 85, 24 January 2008, which concerned rape of detainees by State officials, and M.C. v. Bulgaria, no. 39272/98, §§ 149 and 151, ECHR 2003-XII; P.M. v. Bulgaria, no. 49669/07, § 63, 24 January 2012; D.J. v. Croatia, no. 42418/10, § 83, 24 July 2012; M.N. v. Bulgaria, no. 3832/06, § 34, 27 November 2012; W. v. Slovenia, no. 24125/06, § 63, 23 January 2014; M.A. v. Slovenia, no. 3400/07, § 46, 15 January 2015; N.D. v. Slovenia, no. 16605/09, § 56, 15 January 2015; S.Z. v. Bulgaria, no. 29263/12, § 41, 3 March 2015; I.P. v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 33708/12, § 32, 28 April 2015; Y. v. Slovenia, no. 41107/10, § 95, ECHR 2015 (extracts); S.M. v. Russia, no. 75863/11, § 67, 22 October 2015; I.C. v. Romania, no. 36934/08, § 52, 24 May 2016; and B.V. v. Belgium, no. 61030/08, § 55, 2 May 2017, which concerned rape or serious sexual assault by private persons).
• EGMR, 28.05.2015 - 41107/10

  Y. v. SLOVENIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.02.2020 - 41990/18

  It is settled that rape and serious sexual assault amount to treatment falling within the ambit of Article 3 of the Convention (see Aydin v. Turkey, 25 September 1997, § 83, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-VI, and Maslova and Nalbandov v. Russia, no. 839/02, § 85, 24 January 2008, which concerned rape of detainees by State officials, and M.C. v. Bulgaria, no. 39272/98, §§ 149 and 151, ECHR 2003-XII; P.M. v. Bulgaria, no. 49669/07, § 63, 24 January 2012; D.J. v. Croatia, no. 42418/10, § 83, 24 July 2012; M.N. v. Bulgaria, no. 3832/06, § 34, 27 November 2012; W. v. Slovenia, no. 24125/06, § 63, 23 January 2014; M.A. v. Slovenia, no. 3400/07, § 46, 15 January 2015; N.D. v. Slovenia, no. 16605/09, § 56, 15 January 2015; S.Z. v. Bulgaria, no. 29263/12, § 41, 3 March 2015; I.P. v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 33708/12, § 32, 28 April 2015; Y. v. Slovenia, no. 41107/10, § 95, ECHR 2015 (extracts); S.M. v. Russia, no. 75863/11, § 67, 22 October 2015; I.C. v. Romania, no. 36934/08, § 52, 24 May 2016; and B.V. v. Belgium, no. 61030/08, § 55, 2 May 2017, which concerned rape or serious sexual assault by private persons).

 
• EGMR, 18.05.2000 - 41488/98

  VELIKOVA c. BULGARIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.02.2020 - 41990/18

  (c) that the thoroughness of an investigation must be judged in the light of the practical realities of investigation work (see Velikova v. Bulgaria, no. 41488/98, § 80, ECHR 2000-VI; Giuliani and Gaggio v. Italy [GC], no. 23458/02, § 302, ECHR 2011 (extracts); and Nicolae Virgiliu Tanase v. Romania [GC], no. 41720/13, § 162, 25 June 2019);.
• EGMR, 24.05.2016 - 36934/08

  I.C. v. ROMANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.02.2020 - 41990/18

  It is settled that rape and serious sexual assault amount to treatment falling within the ambit of Article 3 of the Convention (see Aydin v. Turkey, 25 September 1997, § 83, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-VI, and Maslova and Nalbandov v. Russia, no. 839/02, § 85, 24 January 2008, which concerned rape of detainees by State officials, and M.C. v. Bulgaria, no. 39272/98, §§ 149 and 151, ECHR 2003-XII; P.M. v. Bulgaria, no. 49669/07, § 63, 24 January 2012; D.J. v. Croatia, no. 42418/10, § 83, 24 July 2012; M.N. v. Bulgaria, no. 3832/06, § 34, 27 November 2012; W. v. Slovenia, no. 24125/06, § 63, 23 January 2014; M.A. v. Slovenia, no. 3400/07, § 46, 15 January 2015; N.D. v. Slovenia, no. 16605/09, § 56, 15 January 2015; S.Z. v. Bulgaria, no. 29263/12, § 41, 3 March 2015; I.P. v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 33708/12, § 32, 28 April 2015; Y. v. Slovenia, no. 41107/10, § 95, ECHR 2015 (extracts); S.M. v. Russia, no. 75863/11, § 67, 22 October 2015; I.C. v. Romania, no. 36934/08, § 52, 24 May 2016; and B.V. v. Belgium, no. 61030/08, § 55, 2 May 2017, which concerned rape or serious sexual assault by private persons).
• EGMR, 29.11.1991 - 12742/87

  PINE VALLEY DEVELOPMENTS LTD ET AUTRES c. IRLANDE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.02.2020 - 41990/18

  Indeed, the Court has held that suing a private individual is not a remedy with respect to action on the part of the State (see Pine Valley Developments Ltd and Others v. Ireland, 29 November 1991, § 48, Series A no. 222; Iatridis v. Greece [GC], no. 31107/96, § 47 in fine, ECHR 1999-II; and JGK Statyba Ltd and Guselnikovas v. Lithuania, no. 3330/12, § 104, 5 November 2013).
• EGMR, 28.08.1986 - 9228/80

  GLASENAPP c. ALLEMAGNE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.02.2020 - 41990/18

  She thus raised before the national authorities, in substance, the grievance which she has submitted to the Court (see, mutatis mutandis, Glasenapp v. Germany, 28 August 1986, § 44, Series A no. 104; Fressoz and Roire v. France [GC], no. 29183/95, §§ 38-39, ECHR 1999-I; and L.L. v. France, no. 7508/02, § 23, ECHR 2006-XI).
• EGMR, 28.04.2015 - 33708/12

  I.P. v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.02.2020 - 41990/18

  It is settled that rape and serious sexual assault amount to treatment falling within the ambit of Article 3 of the Convention (see Aydin v. Turkey, 25 September 1997, § 83, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-VI, and Maslova and Nalbandov v. Russia, no. 839/02, § 85, 24 January 2008, which concerned rape of detainees by State officials, and M.C. v. Bulgaria, no. 39272/98, §§ 149 and 151, ECHR 2003-XII; P.M. v. Bulgaria, no. 49669/07, § 63, 24 January 2012; D.J. v. Croatia, no. 42418/10, § 83, 24 July 2012; M.N. v. Bulgaria, no. 3832/06, § 34, 27 November 2012; W. v. Slovenia, no. 24125/06, § 63, 23 January 2014; M.A. v. Slovenia, no. 3400/07, § 46, 15 January 2015; N.D. v. Slovenia, no. 16605/09, § 56, 15 January 2015; S.Z. v. Bulgaria, no. 29263/12, § 41, 3 March 2015; I.P. v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 33708/12, § 32, 28 April 2015; Y. v. Slovenia, no. 41107/10, § 95, ECHR 2015 (extracts); S.M. v. Russia, no. 75863/11, § 67, 22 October 2015; I.C. v. Romania, no. 36934/08, § 52, 24 May 2016; and B.V. v. Belgium, no. 61030/08, § 55, 2 May 2017, which concerned rape or serious sexual assault by private persons).
• EGMR, 10.11.1969 - 1602/62

  Stögmüller ./. Österreich

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.02.2020 - 41990/18

  The Court has consistently held that when examining a complaint it can take into account facts - such as the second suspension decision in the present case - which have occurred after the lodging of the application but are directly related to those covered by it (see Stögmüller v. Austria, 10 November 1969, p. 41, § 7, Series A no. 9; Matznetter v. Austria, 10 November 1969, pp. 31-32, § 5, Series A no. 10; and, more recently, Merabishvili v. Georgia [GC], no. 72508/13, § 250 in fine, 28 November 2017).
• EGMR, 22.10.2015 - 75863/11

  S.M. v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.02.2020 - 41990/18

  It is settled that rape and serious sexual assault amount to treatment falling within the ambit of Article 3 of the Convention (see Aydin v. Turkey, 25 September 1997, § 83, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-VI, and Maslova and Nalbandov v. Russia, no. 839/02, § 85, 24 January 2008, which concerned rape of detainees by State officials, and M.C. v. Bulgaria, no. 39272/98, §§ 149 and 151, ECHR 2003-XII; P.M. v. Bulgaria, no. 49669/07, § 63, 24 January 2012; D.J. v. Croatia, no. 42418/10, § 83, 24 July 2012; M.N. v. Bulgaria, no. 3832/06, § 34, 27 November 2012; W. v. Slovenia, no. 24125/06, § 63, 23 January 2014; M.A. v. Slovenia, no. 3400/07, § 46, 15 January 2015; N.D. v. Slovenia, no. 16605/09, § 56, 15 January 2015; S.Z. v. Bulgaria, no. 29263/12, § 41, 3 March 2015; I.P. v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 33708/12, § 32, 28 April 2015; Y. v. Slovenia, no. 41107/10, § 95, ECHR 2015 (extracts); S.M. v. Russia, no. 75863/11, § 67, 22 October 2015; I.C. v. Romania, no. 36934/08, § 52, 24 May 2016; and B.V. v. Belgium, no. 61030/08, § 55, 2 May 2017, which concerned rape or serious sexual assault by private persons).
• EGMR, 10.11.1969 - 2178/64

  Matznetter ./. Österreich
• EGMR, 24.01.2012 - 49669/07

  P.M. v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 21.01.2016 - 71545/12

  L.E. c. GRÈCE
• EGMR, 25.06.2019 - 41720/13

  NICOLAE VIRGILIU TANASE c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 31.03.2016 - 30808/11

  A, B AND C v. LATVIA
• EGMR, 27.11.2012 - 3832/06

  M.N. c. BULGARIE
• EGMR, 02.05.2017 - 61030/08

  B.V. c. BELGIQUE
• EGMR, 15.01.2015 - 16605/09

  N.D. v. SLOVENIA

• EGMR, 12.12.2023 - 15798/20

  VUCKOVIC v. CROATIA

  The Court reiterates at the outset that rape and serious sexual assault amount to treatment that falls within the ambit of Article 3 of the Convention and also engages fundamental values and essential aspects of "private life" within the meaning of Article 8 (see Y v. Bulgaria, no. 41990/18, §§ 63-64, 20 February 2020, and the cases cited therein).

  It is not for the Court to say whether the national courts properly assessed the interplay of those factors; the Court cannot act as a domestic criminal court or hear appeals against the decisions of national courts, and it is not for it to pronounce on any points of criminal liability (see, among other authorities, Myumyun, cited above, § 75, and Y v. Bulgaria, no. 41990/18, § 94, 20 February 2020).

• EGMR, 13.02.2024 - 38588/21

  X v. GREECE

  Since rape and serious sexual assault typically implicate fundamental values and essential aspects of "private life", the Court has also examined cases relating to the positive obligation to investigate cases of rape under Article 8 of the Convention (see, for instance, M.C. v. Bulgaria, no. 39272/98, §§ 149-53, ECHR 2003-XII, and Y v. Bulgaria, no. 41990/18, §§ 62-65, 20 February 2020, and the case-law cited therein).
• EGMR, 28.11.2023 - 18269/18

  KRACHUNOVA v. BULGARIA

  Firstly, it is not for the Court to rule on any points regarding individual criminal liability (see Tanli v. Turkey, no. 26129/95, § 111 in fine, ECHR 2001-III (extracts); M.C. v. Bulgaria, no. 39272/98, § 168 in fine, ECHR 2003-XII; and Y v. Bulgaria, no. 41990/18, § 94, 20 February 2020).

 
• EGMR, 27.05.2021 - 5671/16

  J.L. c. ITALIE

  Elle rappelle que les obligations positives qui pèsent sur les États membres en vertu des articles 3 et 8 de la Convention commandent l'incrimination et la répression effective par des mesures pénales de tout acte sexuel non consensuel (voir, entre autres, M.C. c. Bulgarie, no 39272/98, § 166, CEDH 2003-XII, et Y. c. Bulgarie, no 41990/18, § 95, 20 février 2020).
• EGMR, 14.06.2022 - 56070/18

  STOYANOVA v. BULGARIA

  The Court cannot act as a domestic criminal court or hear appeals against national courts' decisions, and it is not for it to pronounce on any points of criminal liability (see, among other authorities, Myumyun, cited above, § 75, and Y v. Bulgaria, no. 41990/18, § 94, 20 February 2020).
• EGMR, 13.04.2021 - 37882/13

  E.G. c. RÉPUBLIQUE DE MOLDOVA

  La Cour rappelle d'emblée que le viol et les agressions sexuelles graves s'analysent en des traitements entrant dans le champ d'application de l'article 3 de la Convention, qui mettent également en jeu des valeurs fondamentales et des aspects essentiels de la « vie privée'au sens de l'article 8 de la Convention (Y c. Bulgarie, no 41990/18, §§ 63-64, 20 février 2020 et les affaires qui y sont citées).
• EGMR, 17.05.2022 - 23614/20

  Y.P. c. BULGARIE

  Sur le fond 13. La Cour renvoie aux principes généraux de sa jurisprudence concernant l'obligation procédurale découlant des articles 3 et 8 de la Convention tels qu'exposés dans les arrêts X et autres c. Bulgarie ([GC], no 22457/16, §§ 184-190, 2 février 2021), Y c. Bulgarie (no 41990/18, §§ 80-83, 20 février 2020), et Z c. Bulgarie (no 39257/17, §§ 65-69, 28 mai 2020).