Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 20.02.2020 - 58717/10   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2020,2438
EGMR, 20.02.2020 - 58717/10 (https://dejure.org/2020,2438)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 20.02.2020 - 58717/10 (https://dejure.org/2020,2438)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 20. Februar 2020 - 58717/10 (https://dejure.org/2020,2438)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2020,2438) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    NASIROV AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN

    Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention);Violation of Article 9 - Freedom of thought, conscience and religion (Article 9-1 - Freedom of religion) (englisch)

Sonstiges

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (9)Neu Zitiert selbst (11)

  • EGMR, 21.06.2011 - 30194/09

    SHIMOVOLOS v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 20.02.2020 - 58717/10
    The Court reiterates that Article 5 § 1 may apply to deprivations of liberty of a very short duration, for example where applicants were stopped for the purposes of a search for a period which did not exceed thirty minutes during which they were entirely deprived of any freedom of movement and were obliged to remain where they were (see Gillan and Quinton v. the United Kingdom, no. 4158/05, § 57, ECHR 2010 (extracts)) or where the length of time during which an applicant was held at a police station did not exceed forty-five minutes (see Shimovolos v. Russia, no. 30194/09, §§ 48-50, 21 June 2011).
  • EGMR, 18.02.1999 - 24645/94

    BUSCARINI ET AUTRES c. SAINT-MARIN

    Auszug aus EGMR, 20.02.2020 - 58717/10
    That freedom entails, inter alia, freedom to hold or not to hold religious beliefs and to practise or not to practise a religion (see, among other authorities, Kokkinakis v. Greece, 25 May 1993, § 31, Series A no. 260-A; Buscarini and Others v. San Marino [GC], no. 24645/94, § 34, ECHR 1999-I; S.A.S. v. France [GC], no. 43835/11, § 124, ECHR 2014 (extracts); and Izzettin Dogan and Others v. Turkey [GC], no. 62649/10, § 103, 26 April 2016).
  • EGMR, 04.11.2010 - 20364/05

    ALEKSANDR SOKOLOV v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 20.02.2020 - 58717/10
    The absence of a record of such matters as the date, time and location of detention, the name of the detainee, the reasons for the detention and the name of the person effecting it must be seen as incompatible with the requirement of lawfulness and with the very purpose of Article 5 of the Convention (see Aleksandr Sokolov v. Russia, no. 20364/05, §§ 71-72, 4 November 2010; and Nagiyev v. Azerbaijan, no. 16499/09, § 57, 23 April 2015; see also Kurt v. Turkey, 25 May 1998, § 125, Reports 1998-III; and Anguelova v. Bulgaria, no. 38361/97, § 157, ECHR 2002-IV).
  • EGMR, 25.05.1993 - 14307/88

    KOKKINAKIS c. GRÈCE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 20.02.2020 - 58717/10
    That freedom entails, inter alia, freedom to hold or not to hold religious beliefs and to practise or not to practise a religion (see, among other authorities, Kokkinakis v. Greece, 25 May 1993, § 31, Series A no. 260-A; Buscarini and Others v. San Marino [GC], no. 24645/94, § 34, ECHR 1999-I; S.A.S. v. France [GC], no. 43835/11, § 124, ECHR 2014 (extracts); and Izzettin Dogan and Others v. Turkey [GC], no. 62649/10, § 103, 26 April 2016).
  • EGMR, 26.04.2016 - 62649/10

    Türkei verurteilt - Aleviten diskriminiert

    Auszug aus EGMR, 20.02.2020 - 58717/10
    That freedom entails, inter alia, freedom to hold or not to hold religious beliefs and to practise or not to practise a religion (see, among other authorities, Kokkinakis v. Greece, 25 May 1993, § 31, Series A no. 260-A; Buscarini and Others v. San Marino [GC], no. 24645/94, § 34, ECHR 1999-I; S.A.S. v. France [GC], no. 43835/11, § 124, ECHR 2014 (extracts); and Izzettin Dogan and Others v. Turkey [GC], no. 62649/10, § 103, 26 April 2016).
  • EGMR, 07.05.2015 - 59135/09

    EMIN HUSEYNOV v. AZERBAIJAN

    Auszug aus EGMR, 20.02.2020 - 58717/10
    What is at stake here is not only the "right to liberty" but also the "right to security of person" (see, among other authorities, Bozano v. France, 18 December 1986, § 54, Series A no. 111, Wassink v. the Netherlands, 27 September 1990, § 24, Series A no. 185-A, and Emin Huseynov v. Azerbaijan, no. 59135/09, § 84, 7 May 2015).
  • EGMR, 23.04.2015 - 16499/09

    NAGIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN

    Auszug aus EGMR, 20.02.2020 - 58717/10
    The absence of a record of such matters as the date, time and location of detention, the name of the detainee, the reasons for the detention and the name of the person effecting it must be seen as incompatible with the requirement of lawfulness and with the very purpose of Article 5 of the Convention (see Aleksandr Sokolov v. Russia, no. 20364/05, §§ 71-72, 4 November 2010; and Nagiyev v. Azerbaijan, no. 16499/09, § 57, 23 April 2015; see also Kurt v. Turkey, 25 May 1998, § 125, Reports 1998-III; and Anguelova v. Bulgaria, no. 38361/97, § 157, ECHR 2002-IV).
  • EGMR, 18.12.1986 - 9990/82

    BOZANO v. FRANCE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 20.02.2020 - 58717/10
    What is at stake here is not only the "right to liberty" but also the "right to security of person" (see, among other authorities, Bozano v. France, 18 December 1986, § 54, Series A no. 111, Wassink v. the Netherlands, 27 September 1990, § 24, Series A no. 185-A, and Emin Huseynov v. Azerbaijan, no. 59135/09, § 84, 7 May 2015).
  • EGMR, 10.11.2005 - 44774/98

    LEYLA SAHIN v. TURKEY

    Auszug aus EGMR, 20.02.2020 - 58717/10
    Bearing witness in words and deeds is bound up with the existence of religious convictions (see Kokkinakis, cited above, § 31, and Leyla ??ahin v. Turkey [GC], no. 44774/98, § 105, ECHR 2005-XI).
  • EGMR, 01.07.2014 - 43835/11

    Gesichtsschleier-Verbot rechtens

    Auszug aus EGMR, 20.02.2020 - 58717/10
    That freedom entails, inter alia, freedom to hold or not to hold religious beliefs and to practise or not to practise a religion (see, among other authorities, Kokkinakis v. Greece, 25 May 1993, § 31, Series A no. 260-A; Buscarini and Others v. San Marino [GC], no. 24645/94, § 34, ECHR 1999-I; S.A.S. v. France [GC], no. 43835/11, § 124, ECHR 2014 (extracts); and Izzettin Dogan and Others v. Turkey [GC], no. 62649/10, § 103, 26 April 2016).
  • EGMR, 13.06.2002 - 38361/97

    ANGUELOVA v. BULGARIA

  • EGMR, 16.04.2024 - 40669/16

    NINA DIMITROVA v. BULGARIA

    Such links can be showed by presenting documents from the local administration, plans, photographs or maintenance receipts, proof of mail deliveries, statements of witnesses - or, indeed, any other relevant evidence (see Nasirov and Others v. Azerbaijan, no. 58717/10, § 73, 20 February 2020).
  • EGMR, 07.07.2022 - 72611/14

    TAGIYEVA v. AZERBAIJAN

    The Court observes that the applicant failed to produce any contract concerning her representation by Ms R. Remezaite and Mr P. Leach or any other relevant documents showing that she had paid or was under a legal obligation to pay the fees charged by her representatives (see Merabishvili v. Georgia [GC], no. 72508/13, § 372, 28 November 2017; Nasirov and Others v. Azerbaijan, no. 58717/10, § 89, 20 February 2020; and Bagirov v. Azerbaijan, nos.
  • EGMR, 09.06.2022 - 42858/11

    HASANALI ALIYEV AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN

    It therefore rejects the third applicant's complaint as being incompatible ratione materiae with the provisions of the Convention, pursuant to Article 35 §§ 3 (a) and 4 of the Convention (compare Nasirov and Others v. Azerbaijan, no. 58717/10, § 75, 20 February 2020).
  • EGMR, 09.11.2023 - 50612/18

    MAHMUDOV v. AZERBAIJAN

    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 § 1 OF THE CONVENTION 14. The general principles concerning unlawful arrest and detention have been summarised in Nasirov and Others v. Azerbaijan (no. 58717/10, §§ 46-47, 20 February 2020).
  • EGMR, 28.04.2022 - 59202/12

    HASANOV v. AZERBAIJAN

    The applicable general principles under Article 5 of the Convention have been stated in Nasirov and Others v. Azerbaijan (no. 58717/10, §§ 46-47, 20 February 2020).
  • EGMR, 01.09.2022 - 72608/13

    GULIYEVA v. AZERBAIJAN

    The applicable general principles under Article 5 of the Convention have been stated in Nasirov and Others v. Azerbaijan (no. 58717/10, §§ 46-47, 20 February 2020).
  • EGMR, 09.09.2021 - 30133/12

    HASANOV v. AZERBAIJAN

    The absence of a record of such matters as the date, time and location of detention, the name of the detainee, the reasons for the detention and the name of the person effecting it must be seen as incompatible with the requirement of lawfulness and with the very purpose of Article 5 of the Convention (see Anguelova v. Bulgaria, no. 38361/97, § 157, ECHR 2002-IV; Nagiyev, cited above, § 57; and Nasirov and Others v. Azerbaijan, no. 58717/10, § 49, 20 February 2020).
  • EGMR, 09.06.2022 - 47915/09

    DADASHOV AND HAJIBEYLI v. AZERBAIJAN

    The Court refers to the general principles established in its case-law and set out in Nasirov and Others v. Azerbaijan (no. 58717/10, §§ 46-47, 20 February 2020).
  • EGMR, 22.02.2022 - 17715/12

    ZHARINOVA v. RUSSIA

    The Court has consistently held that failure to document a person's deprivation of liberty constitutes unrecorded and unacknowledged detention, which is unlawful in itself (see Nasirov and Others v. Azerbaijan, no. 58717/10, §§ 47-51, 20 February 2020, with further references).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht