Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 20.03.2012 - 61319/09 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2012,15595) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
FOX v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... (4) Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 25803/94
Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des …
Auszug aus EGMR, 20.03.2012 - 61319/09
The Court recalls the requirements of the rule of exhaustion of domestic remedies summarised in its judgment in Selmouni v. France ([GC], no. 25803/94, §§ 74-77, ECHR 1999 V):. - EGMR, 06.11.1980 - 7654/76
VAN OOSTERWIJCK c. BELGIQUE
Auszug aus EGMR, 20.03.2012 - 61319/09
The rule has been applied strictly; even, for example, in a case when legal aid is not available to bring costly national proceedings, including constitutional proceedings (see D. v Ireland, cited above; see also Cyprus v. Turkey [GC], no. 25781/94, § 352, ECHR 2001-IV; and Van Oosterwijck v. Belgium, 6 November 1980, § 38, Series A no. 40).
- EGMR, 27.10.2015 - 76760/12
N.J.D.B. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
However, an applicant is not required to use a remedy which, "according to settled legal opinion existing at the relevant time", offers no reasonable prospects of providing redress for his complaint (see D. v. Ireland (dec.), no. 26499/02, §§ 89 and 91, 28 June 2006; and, more recently, Fox v the United Kingdom (dec.) 61319/09, § 42 20 March 2012). - EGMR, 15.01.2013 - 39678/09
L.L. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
However, an applicant is not required to use a remedy which, "according to settled legal opinion existing at the relevant time", offers no reasonable prospects of providing redress for his complaint (see Fox v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 61319/09, 20 March 2012). - EGMR, 05.01.2016 - 35752/13
BAHMANZADEH v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
However, an applicant is not required to use a remedy which, "according to settled legal opinion existing at the relevant time", offers no reasonable prospects of providing redress for his complaint (see D. v. Ireland (dec.), no. 26499/02, §§ 89 and 91, 28 June 2006; and, more recently, Fox v the United Kingdom (dec.) 61319/09, § 42 20 March 2012). - EGMR, 05.01.2016 - 59703/13
ROBERTS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
However, an applicant is not required to use a remedy which, "according to settled legal opinion existing at the relevant time", offers no reasonable prospects of providing redress for his complaint (see D. v. Ireland (dec.), no. 26499/02, §§ 89 and 91, 28 June 2006; and, more recently, Fox v. the United Kingdom (dec.) 61319/09, § 42 20 March 2012).