Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  MILOSEVIC v. \

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 29, Art. 29 Abs. 3, Art. 41 MRK
  Violation of Art. 6-1 Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed Non-pecuniary damage - financial award (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (22)Neu Zitiert selbst (2)

• EGMR, 30.10.1998 - 28616/95

  STYRANOWSKI v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.04.2006 - 15056/02

  The Court reiterates that in order to determine the reasonableness of the length of time in question, regard must be had to the state of the case on 10 April 1997 (see, among other authorities, Foti and Others v. Italy, judgment of 10 December 1982, Series A no. 56, p. 18, § 53, and Styranowski v. Poland, no. 28616/95, § 46, ECHR 1998-VIII).
• EGMR, 10.12.1982 - 7604/76

  FOTI ET AUTRES c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.04.2006 - 15056/02

  The Court reiterates that in order to determine the reasonableness of the length of time in question, regard must be had to the state of the case on 10 April 1997 (see, among other authorities, Foti and Others v. Italy, judgment of 10 December 1982, Series A no. 56, p. 18, § 53, and Styranowski v. Poland, no. 28616/95, § 46, ECHR 1998-VIII).

• EGMR, 16.10.2014 - 27307/04

  GORESKI AND OTHERS v.

  The Court rejects the claim for the costs and expenses in the domestic proceedings since they were not incurred in order to seek through the domestic legal order prevention and redress of the alleged violation complained of before the Court (see Milosevic v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no. 15056/02, § 34, 20 April 2006).
• EGMR, 31.05.2007 - 13270/02

  DIKA v.

  In assessing the reasonableness of the time that elapsed after that date, account must be taken of the state of proceedings on 10 April 1997 (see Milosevic v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no. 15056/02, § 21, 20 April 2006; Styranowski v. Poland, no. 28616/95, § 46, ECHR 1998-VIII; Foti and Others v. Italy, judgment of 10 December 1982, Series A no. 56, p. 18, § 53).
• EGMR, 25.03.2010 - 40233/03

  TOMISLAV JOVANOVSKI v.

  Accordingly, it does not award any sum under this head (see Milosevic v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no. 15056/02, § 34, 20 April 2006).

 
• EGMR, 28.05.2009 - 28827/02

  ISAYEV v. UKRAINE

  However, in assessing the reasonableness of the time that elapsed after 11 September 1997, account must be taken of the state of proceedings on that date (see, mutatis mutandis, Milosevic v. "the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia", no. 15056/02, § 21, 20 April 2006; Styranowski v. Poland, no. 28616/95, § 46, ECHR 1998-VIII; Foti and Others v. Italy, judgment of 10 December 1982, Series A no. 56, p. 18, § 53).
• EGMR, 11.12.2008 - 22581/04

  CHEPYZHNA v. UKRAINE

  However, in assessing the reasonableness of the time that elapsed after 11 September 1997, account must be taken of the state of proceedings on that date (see Milosevic v. "the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia", no. 15056/02, § 21, 20 April 2006; Styranowski v. Poland, no. 28616/95, § 46, ECHR 1998-VIII; Foti and Others v. Italy, judgment of 10 December 1982, Series A no. 56, p. 18, § 53).
• EGMR, 11.12.2008 - 11447/04

  LOSHENKO v. UKRAINE

  However, in assessing the reasonableness of the time that elapsed after 11 September 1997, account must be taken of the state of proceedings on that date (see Miloseviÿ v. "the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia", no. 15056/02, § 21, 20 April 2006; Styranowski v. Poland, no. 28616/95, § 46, ECHR 1998-VIII; and Foti and Others v. Italy, judgment of 10 December 1982, Series A no. 56, p. 18, § 53).
• EGMR, 23.10.2008 - 13904/02

  KRSTO NIKOLOV v.

  As to the costs and expenses incurred in the proceedings before the domestic courts, the Court notes that such costs were not incurred in order to seek through the domestic legal order prevention and redress of the alleged violation complained of before the Court (see Milosevic v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no. 15056/02, § 34, 20 April 2006).
• EGMR, 31.01.2008 - 22775/03

  FANDRALYUK v. UKRAINE

  However, in assessing the reasonableness of the time that elapsed after 11 September 1997, account must be taken of the state of proceedings on that date (see Milosevic v. "the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia", no. 15056/02, § 21, 20 April 2006; Styranowski v. Poland, no. 28616/95, § 46, ECHR 1998-VIII; Foti and Others v. Italy, judgment of 10 December 1982, Series A no. 56, p. 18, § 53).
• EGMR, 29.11.2007 - 26541/02

  NANKOV v.

  In assessing the reasonableness of the time that elapsed after that date, account must be taken of the state of proceedings on 10 April 1997 (see Milosevic v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no. 15056/02, § 21, 20 April 2006; Styranowski v. Poland, no. 28616/95, § 46, ECHR 1998-VIII; and Foti and Others v. Italy, judgment of 10 December 1982, Series A no. 56, p. 18, § 53).
• EGMR, 21.06.2007 - 9616/03

  SVISTUN v. UKRAINE

  However, in assessing the reasonableness of the time that elapsed after 11 September 1997, account must be taken of the state of proceedings on that date (see Milosevic v. "the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia", no. 15056/02, § 21, 20 April 2006; Styranowski v. Poland, no. 28616/95, § 46, ECHR 1998-VIII; Foti and Others v. Italy, judgment of 10 December 1982, Series A no. 56, p. 18, § 53).
• EGMR, 01.02.2007 - 12803/02

  OGURTSOVA v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 30.11.2006 - 26124/02

  MZT LEARNICA A.D. v.
• EGMR, 10.06.2021 - 2833/13

  BAJIC v. NORTH MACEDONIA
• EGMR, 28.01.2010 - 38183/04

  RISTESKA v.
• EGMR, 23.07.2009 - 35640/04

  VELJANOSKA v.
• EGMR, 11.12.2008 - 17022/02

  ANTONYUK v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 26.07.2007 - 25444/03

  KALINICHENKO v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 01.02.2007 - 9724/03

  LITVINYUK v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 24.02.2011 - 14419/03

  CANGOV v.
• EGMR, 22.04.2010 - 35164/03

  ILIEVSKI v.
• EGMR, 27.01.2009 - 15808/04

  LYUBCHENKO v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 20.12.2007 - 18345/03

  LEBEDEVA v. UKRAINE