Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 20.05.2010 - 7877/03   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2010,62672
EGMR, 20.05.2010 - 7877/03 (https://dejure.org/2010,62672)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 20.05.2010 - 7877/03 (https://dejure.org/2010,62672)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 20. Mai 2010 - 7877/03 (https://dejure.org/2010,62672)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2010,62672) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

Kurzfassungen/Presse

  • lehofer.at (Kurzinformation)

    Myrskyy gegen Ukraine

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (5)

  • EGMR, 25.11.1999 - 23118/93

    NILSEN AND JOHNSEN v. NORWAY

    Auszug aus EGMR, 20.05.2010 - 7877/03
    As set forth in Article 10, this freedom is subject to exceptions, which must, however, be construed strictly, and the need for any restrictions must be established convincingly (see Nilsen and Johnsen v. Norway [GC], no. 23118/93, § 43, ECHR 1999-VIII).
  • EGMR, 27.02.2001 - 26958/95

    JERUSALEM c. AUTRICHE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 20.05.2010 - 7877/03
    As to the finding that the Party had as an aim the instillation of extreme nationalist ideology, the Court notes that the applicant was able to bring all the evidence he wished in order to support his claims in this regard (see and contrast with Jerusalem v. Austria, no. 26958/95, § 45, ECHR 2001-II), but the courts nevertheless decided that the aims of the Party were to be established on the basis of its programme, and therefore found against the applicant on the point.
  • EGMR, 30.11.2006 - 10807/04

    VERAART v. THE NETHERLANDS

    Auszug aus EGMR, 20.05.2010 - 7877/03
    In doing so, the Court has to satisfy itself that the national authorities applied standards which were in conformity with the principles embodied in Article 10 and, moreover, that they based themselves on an acceptable assessment of the relevant facts (see Jersild v. Denmark, 23 September 1994, § 31, Series A no. 298, and Veraart v. the Netherlands, no. 10807/04, § 61, 30 November 2006).
  • EGMR, 23.09.1994 - 15890/89

    JERSILD v. DENMARK

    Auszug aus EGMR, 20.05.2010 - 7877/03
    In doing so, the Court has to satisfy itself that the national authorities applied standards which were in conformity with the principles embodied in Article 10 and, moreover, that they based themselves on an acceptable assessment of the relevant facts (see Jersild v. Denmark, 23 September 1994, § 31, Series A no. 298, and Veraart v. the Netherlands, no. 10807/04, § 61, 30 November 2006).
  • EGMR, 20.05.1999 - 21980/93

    BLADET TROMSØ ET STENSAAS c. NORVEGE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 20.05.2010 - 7877/03
    On the issue whether the interference was necessary "in a democratic society", the Court reiterates that this depends on whether the interference complained of corresponded to a pressing social need, whether it was proportionate to the legitimate aim pursued and whether the reasons given by the national authorities to justify it are relevant and sufficient (see Bladet Tromsø and Stensaas v. Norway [GC], no. 21980/93, § 58, ECHR 1999-III).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht