Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  BERLINSKI v. POLAND

  Art. 3, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. c, Art. 41 MRK
  No violation of Art. 3 Violation of Art. 6-1 and 6-3-c Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs and expenses - claim dismissed (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 18.01.2001 - 27715/95
• EGMR, 20.06.2002 - 27715/95, 30209/96

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Neu Zitiert selbst (5)

• EGMR, 08.02.1996 - 18731/91

  JOHN MURRAY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.06.2002 - 27715/95

  In its judgment in the case of John Murray v. the United Kingdom (no. 18731/91, 8.2.1996, § 63, ECHR 1996-I), the Court also observed that, although Article 6 will normally require that the accused be allowed to benefit from the assistance of a lawyer at the initial stages of police interrogation, this right, which is not explicitly set out in the Convention, may be subject to restriction for good cause.
• EGMR, 28.10.1998 - 24760/94

  ASSENOV AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.06.2002 - 27715/95

  The Court considers that the degree of bruising found by the various experts who examined the applicants indicates that the injuries were sufficiently serious to amount to ill-treatment within the scope of Article 3 (see, mutatis mutandis, Assenov and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 24760/94, 28.10.1998, § 95, ECHR 1998-VIII).
• EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95

  LABITA c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.06.2002 - 27715/95

  The question whether the purpose of the treatment was to humiliate or debase the victim is a further factor to be taken into account, but the absence of any such purpose cannot conclusively rule out a finding of violation of Article 3 (see Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, 6.4.2000, §§ 119-120, ECHR 2000-IV).
• EGMR, 28.11.2000 - 29462/95

  REHBOCK c. SLOVENIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.06.2002 - 27715/95

  Secondly, while the six police officers outnumbered the two applicants, account must be taken of the fact that the applicants were practising bodybuilders, and that they effectively resisted the legitimate actions of the police officers - by refusing to comply with the verbal demands to leave the athletics club, resisting the attempts of the policemen to apprehend them, and kicking two officers (see, by contrast, Rehbock v. Slovenia, no. 29462/95, 28.11.2000, ECHR 200-XII, where thirteen police officers had had sufficient time to evaluate the possible risks in connection with the arrest of three suspects, and where an applicant had shown no sign of resisting the arrest).
• EGMR, 16.10.2001 - 39846/98

  BRENNAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.06.2002 - 27715/95

  The manner in which Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (c) is to be applied during the preliminary investigation depends on the special features of the proceedings involved and on the circumstances of the case (see Brennan v. the United Kingdom, no. 39846/98, 16.10.2001, § 45, ECHR 2001-X).

• EGMR, 08.12.2009 - 45291/06

  PREVITI c. ITALIE

  Or, si l'article 6 de la Convention peut jouer un rôle avant la saisine du juge du fond, cette disposition a pour finalité principale, au pénal, d'assurer un procès équitable devant un «tribunal» compétent pour décider «du bien-fondé de l'accusation» (Brennan c. Royaume-Uni [GC], no 39846/98, § 45, CEDH 2001-X, et Berlinski c. Pologne, nos 27715/95 et 30209/96, § 75, 20 juin 2002).
• EGMR, 06.11.2007 - 17543/05

  HANY c. ITALIE

  Or, si l'article 6 de la Convention peut jouer un rôle avant la saisine du juge du fond, cette disposition a pour finalité principale, au pénal, d'assurer un procès équitable devant un «tribunal» compétent pour décider «du bien - fondé de l'accusation» (Brennan c. Royaume-Uni [GC], no 39846/98, § 45, CEDH 2001-X, et Berlinski c. Pologne, nos 27715/95 et 30209/96, § 75, 20 juin 2002).