Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 20.06.2002 - 29296/95 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2002,36039) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
IGDELI v. TURKEY
Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 3, Art. 5 Abs. 4, Art. 41 MRK
Violation of Art. 5-3 Violation of Art. 5-4 Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings ...
Verfahrensgang
- EKMR, 02.07.1997 - 29296/95
- EGMR, 30.05.2000 - 29296/95
- EGMR, 20.06.2002 - 29296/95
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (1)
- EGMR, 24.06.1982 - 7906/77
VAN DROOGENBROECK v. BELGIUM
Auszug aus EGMR, 20.06.2002 - 29296/95
The Court considers that where a detained person has to wait for a period to challenge the lawfulness of his custody, there may be a breach of Article 5 § 4. Having regard to the conclusion it reached with regard to Article 5 § 3 (see paragraph 33 above) the Court considers that the period in question sits ill with the notion of "speedily" under Article 5 § 4 of the Convention (the Van Droogenbroeck v. Belgium judgment of 24 June 1982, Series A no. 50, p.29, § 53).