Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 20.07.2004 - 50178/99   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2004,26609
EGMR, 20.07.2004 - 50178/99 (https://dejure.org/2004,26609)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 20.07.2004 - 50178/99 (https://dejure.org/2004,26609)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 20. Juli 2004 - 50178/99 (https://dejure.org/2004,26609)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2004,26609) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichungen (3)

Kurzfassungen/Presse

Verfahrensgang

 
Sortierung


Kontextvorschau



Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (41)Neu Zitiert selbst (7)

  • EGMR, 22.06.1999 - 47033/99

    TUMILOVICH v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 20.07.2004 - 50178/99
    The Court has, for example, not accepted that supervisory review is an effective domestic remedy in either the civil or the criminal contexts (see Tumilovich v. Russia (dec.), no. 47033/99, 22 June 1999, and Berdzenishvili v. Russia (dec.), no. 31697/03, ECHR 2004-II), and it has found that the quashing of a judgment on supervisory review can create problems as to the legal certainty to be afforded to the initial judgment (see Brumarescu v. Romania [GC], no. 28342/95, § 62, ECHR 1999-VII, and Ryabykh v. Russia, no. 52854/99, §§ 56-58, ECHR 2003-IX).
  • EGMR, 03.10.2002 - 48154/99

    ZIGARELLA contre l'ITALIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 20.07.2004 - 50178/99
    In order to examine the merits of the complaints in question, we should first be satisfied that the applicant was either tried or prosecuted (see Zigarella v. Italy (dec.), no. 48154/99, ECHR 2002-IX) through, or as a result of, the request by the Procurator General to the Presidium of the Supreme Court that the case be reviewed in supervisory proceedings.
  • EGMR, 29.01.2004 - 31697/03

    BERDZENISHVILI v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 20.07.2004 - 50178/99
    The Court has, for example, not accepted that supervisory review is an effective domestic remedy in either the civil or the criminal contexts (see Tumilovich v. Russia (dec.), no. 47033/99, 22 June 1999, and Berdzenishvili v. Russia (dec.), no. 31697/03, ECHR 2004-II), and it has found that the quashing of a judgment on supervisory review can create problems as to the legal certainty to be afforded to the initial judgment (see Brumarescu v. Romania [GC], no. 28342/95, § 62, ECHR 1999-VII, and Ryabykh v. Russia, no. 52854/99, §§ 56-58, ECHR 2003-IX).
     
  • EGMR, 12.02.2004 - 69582/01

    SARDINE c. RUSSIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 20.07.2004 - 50178/99
    However, it had no decisive impact on the fairness of the procedure for reopening as a whole, which was primarily a matter for the Presidium's deliberation (see, mutatis mutandis, Voloshchuk v. Ukraine (dec.), no. 51394/99, 14 October 2003, and Sardin v. Russia (dec.), no. 69582/01, ECHR 2004-II).
  • EGMR, 14.10.2003 - 51394/99

    VOLOSHCHUK contre l'UKRAINE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 20.07.2004 - 50178/99
    However, it had no decisive impact on the fairness of the procedure for reopening as a whole, which was primarily a matter for the Presidium's deliberation (see, mutatis mutandis, Voloshchuk v. Ukraine (dec.), no. 51394/99, 14 October 2003, and Sardin v. Russia (dec.), no. 69582/01, ECHR 2004-II).
  • EGMR, 23.10.1995 - 15963/90

    GRADINGER c. AUTRICHE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 20.07.2004 - 50178/99
    It reiterates that the aim of Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 is to prohibit the repetition of criminal proceedings that have been concluded by a final decision (see, among other authorities, Gradinger v. Austria, judgment of 23 October 1995, Series A no. 328-C, p. 65, § 53).
  • EGMR, 24.07.2003 - 52854/99

    RIABYKH c. RUSSIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 20.07.2004 - 50178/99
    The Court has, for example, not accepted that supervisory review is an effective domestic remedy in either the civil or the criminal contexts (see Tumilovich v. Russia (dec.), no. 47033/99, 22 June 1999, and Berdzenishvili v. Russia (dec.), no. 31697/03, ECHR 2004-II), and it has found that the quashing of a judgment on supervisory review can create problems as to the legal certainty to be afforded to the initial judgment (see Brumarescu v. Romania [GC], no. 28342/95, § 62, ECHR 1999-VII, and Ryabykh v. Russia, no. 52854/99, §§ 56-58, ECHR 2003-IX).
  • EGMR, 10.02.2009 - 14939/03

    Sergeï Zolotoukhine ./. Russland

    The Court has emphasised that Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 contains three distinct guarantees and provides that no one shall be (i) liable to be tried, or (ii) tried, or (iii) punished for the same offence (see Nikitin v. Russia, no. 50178/99, § 36, ECHR 2004-...).
  • EGMR, 11.07.2017 - 19867/12

    MOREIRA FERREIRA v. PORTUGAL (No. 2)

    Accordingly, the Court has held that the mere possibility of reopening a criminal case is prima facie compatible with the Convention (see Nikitin v. Russia, no. 50178/99, §§ 55-57, ECHR 2004-VIII).

    Thus, the Nikitin v. Russia judgment (no. 50178/99, ECHR 2004-VIII, §§ 55-57 - cited in paragraph 62 of the judgment) addressed the quite different situation of the possible reopening, to the detriment of the accused, of criminal proceedings that have terminated with an acquittal.

  • Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 02.05.2014 - C-129/14

    Spasic - Eilvorabentscheidungsverfahren - Polizeiliche und justizielle …

    63 - Vgl. u. a. Urteile des EGMR vom 20. Juli 2004, Nikitin/Russland (Beschwerde Nr. 50178/99, § 37), vom 15. März 2005, Horciag/Rumänien (Beschwerde Nr. 70982/01), vom 14. Januar 2014, Muslija/Bosnien-Herzegowina (Beschwerde Nr. 32042/11), und vom 3. Oktober 2002, Zigarella/Italien (Beschwerde Nr. 48154/99).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht