Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 20.09.2016 - 4345/06 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2016,29239) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
BURMAGA v. RUSSIA
Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Review of lawfulness of detention) (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 13.07.1995 - 17977/91
KAMPANIS v. GREECE
Auszug aus EGMR, 20.09.2016 - 4345/06
The possibility for a detainee to be heard either in person or through some form of representation features among the fundamental procedural guarantees applied in matters concerning the deprivation of liberty (see Mamedova v. Russia, no. 7064/05, § 89, 1 June 2006; Reinprecht v. Austria, no. 67175/01, § 31, ECHR 2005-XII, and Kampanis v. Greece, 13 July 1995, § 47, Series A no. 318-B). - EGMR, 01.06.2006 - 7064/05
MAMEDOVA v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 20.09.2016 - 4345/06
The possibility for a detainee to be heard either in person or through some form of representation features among the fundamental procedural guarantees applied in matters concerning the deprivation of liberty (see Mamedova v. Russia, no. 7064/05, § 89, 1 June 2006; Reinprecht v. Austria, no. 67175/01, § 31, ECHR 2005-XII, and Kampanis v. Greece, 13 July 1995, § 47, Series A no. 318-B). - EGMR, 27.04.1988 - 9659/82
BOYLE AND RICE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 20.09.2016 - 4345/06
Having regard to that finding, the Court considers that the applicant does not have an "arguable claim" and his complaint does not attract the guarantees of Article 13. This part of the application must also be rejected as manifestly ill-founded pursuant to Article 35 §§ 3 and 4 of the Convention (see Boyle and Rice v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 27 April 1988, Series A no. 131, p. 131, § 52).