Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  VLASOV AND BENYASH v. RUSSIA

  Violation of Article 2 of Protocol No. 4 - Freedom of movement-general (Article 2 para. 2 of Protocol No. 4 - Freedom to leave a country);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  VLASOV v. RUSSIA

  Protokoll Nr. 4 Art. 2, Protokoll Nr. 4 Art. 2 Abs. 2, Protokoll Nr. 4 Art. 2 Abs. 3 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Neu Zitiert selbst (3)

• EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95

  LABITA c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.09.2016 - 51279/09

  Thus, the Court has allowed restrictions on the freedom of movement of individuals suspected of being members of a criminal syndicate (see Raimondo v. Italy, 22 February 1994, § 39, Series A no. 281-A, and Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 195, ECHR 2000-IV) or of an individual who had been found guilty of a violent offence (see Villa v. Italy, no. 19675/06, §§ 45-50, 20 April 2010).
• EGMR, 21.12.2006 - 55565/00

  BARTIK v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.09.2016 - 51279/09

  A measure by means of which an individual is denied the use of a document which, had he so wished, would have permitted him to leave the country, amounts to an interference within the meaning of Article 2 of Protocol No. 4 and must meet the requirements of paragraph 3 of that Article (see Bartik v. Russia, no. 55565/00, § 36, ECHR 2006-XV, and Napijalo v. Croatia, no. 66485/01, § 68, 13 November 2003).
• EGMR, 22.02.1994 - 12954/87

  RAIMONDO v. ITALY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.09.2016 - 51279/09

  Thus, the Court has allowed restrictions on the freedom of movement of individuals suspected of being members of a criminal syndicate (see Raimondo v. Italy, 22 February 1994, § 39, Series A no. 281-A, and Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 195, ECHR 2000-IV) or of an individual who had been found guilty of a violent offence (see Villa v. Italy, no. 19675/06, §§ 45-50, 20 April 2010).

• EGMR, 19.01.2023 - 24203/16

  PAGERIE c. FRANCE

  Les mesures de nature préventive doivent être fondées sur des éléments concrets et réellement révélateurs de l'actualité du risque dont elles visent à éviter la réalisation (voir, mutatis mutandis, Nalbantski, précité, § 65, et Vlasov et Benyash c. Russie, nos 51279/09 et 32098/13, § 34, 20 septembre 2016 ; voir également Labita, précité, § 196).
• EGMR, 10.10.2023 - 42286/21

  TINGAROV AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA

  The seriousness of their offences, to which the Government referred, had not been put forward as the reason for their individual disenfranchisement at any time or form at the domestic level and was raised for the first time in the proceedings before the Court (compare, mutatis mutandis, Vlasov and Benyash v. Russia, nos. 51279/09 and 32098, § 36, 20 September 2016, and contrast Kalda v. Estonia (no. 2), no. 14581/20, § 48, 6 December 2022).