Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 20.09.2016 - 71271/12   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2016,60257
EGMR, 20.09.2016 - 71271/12 (https://dejure.org/2016,60257)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 20.09.2016 - 71271/12 (https://dejure.org/2016,60257)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 20. September 2016 - 71271/12 (https://dejure.org/2016,60257)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2016,60257) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (3)

  • EGMR, 02.12.2008 - 21447/03

    PREDESCU c. ROUMANIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 20.09.2016 - 71271/12
    The Court reiterates that an application may be rejected as an abuse of the right of individual application within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention if, among other reasons, it was knowingly based on false information (see Gross v. Switzerland [GC], no. 67810/10, § 28, ECHR 2014; and S.A.S. v. France [GC], no. 43835/11, § 67, ECHR 2014) or if significant information and documents were deliberately omitted, either where they were known from the outset or where new significant developments occurred during the proceedings (see Predescu v. Romania, no. 21447/03, §§ 25-27, 2 December 2008; and Tatalovic and Dekic v. Serbia (dec.), no. 15433/07, 29 May 2012).
  • EGMR, 29.01.2013 - 75381/10

    KOMATINOVIC v. SERBIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 20.09.2016 - 71271/12
    Incomplete and therefore misleading information may amount to an abuse of the right of application, especially if the information in question concerns the very core of the case and no sufficient explanation is given for the failure to disclose that information (see Predescu, cited above, §§ 25-26; and Komatinovic v. Serbia (dec.), no. 75381/10, 29 January 2013).
  • EGMR, 01.07.2014 - 43835/11

    Gesichtsschleier-Verbot rechtens

    Auszug aus EGMR, 20.09.2016 - 71271/12
    The Court reiterates that an application may be rejected as an abuse of the right of individual application within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention if, among other reasons, it was knowingly based on false information (see Gross v. Switzerland [GC], no. 67810/10, § 28, ECHR 2014; and S.A.S. v. France [GC], no. 43835/11, § 67, ECHR 2014) or if significant information and documents were deliberately omitted, either where they were known from the outset or where new significant developments occurred during the proceedings (see Predescu v. Romania, no. 21447/03, §§ 25-27, 2 December 2008; and Tatalovic and Dekic v. Serbia (dec.), no. 15433/07, 29 May 2012).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht