Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 20.10.2005 - 37930/02 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2005,61714) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
BAZHENOV v. RUSSIA
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 29, Art. 29 Abs. 3, Art. 34, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 37, Art. 37 Abs. 1 Buchst. c, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
Violation of Art. 6-1 Violation of P1-1 Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed Non-pecuniary damage - financial award (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 26.06.2001 - 37453/97
AKMAN c. TURQUIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 20.10.2005 - 37930/02
On the facts, the Court observes that the Government failed to submit with the Court any formal statement capable of falling into the latter category and offering a sufficient basis for finding that respect for human rights as defined in the Convention does not require the Court to continue its examination of the case (see, by contrast, Aleksentseva and Others cited above and Akman v. Turkey (striking out), no. 37453/97, §§ 23-24, ECHR 2001-VI). - EGMR, 09.12.1994 - 13427/87
RAFFINERIES GRECQUES STRAN ET STRATIS ANDREADIS c. GRÈCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 20.10.2005 - 37930/02
The Court reiterates that a "claim" can constitute a "possession" within the meaning of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 if it is sufficiently established to be enforceable (see Burdov v. Russia, cited above, § 40, and Stran Greek Refineries and Stratis Andreadis v. Greece, judgment of 9 December 1994, Series A no. 301-B, p. 84, § 59).