Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 20.10.2005 - 71841/01 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2005,45441) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
YETKINSEKERCI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 34, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
Violation of Art. 6-1 Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs and expenses partial award - domestic proceedings (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 11.12.2003 - 71841/01
- EGMR, 20.10.2005 - 71841/01
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 25.03.1999 - 25444/94
PÉLISSIER AND SASSI v. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 20.10.2005 - 71841/01
The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities (see, among many other authorities, Pélissier and Sassi v. France [GC], no. 25444/94, § 67, ECHR 1999-II). - EGMR, 15.07.1982 - 8130/78
Eckle ./. Deutschland
Auszug aus EGMR, 20.10.2005 - 71841/01
As to the Government's contention that the applicant is not a "victim" within the meaning of Article 34, the Court recalls that a reduction in sentence can have the effect of rendering an applicant "no longer a victim" if the reduction is measurable and is expressly directed to the excessive length of the proceedings (in Eckle v. Germany, (judgment of 15 July 1982, Series A no. 51, § 65 - 70) the applicant could continue to claim to be a victim; in Lie and Berntsen v. Norway (no. 25130/94, dec. 16 December 1999) and Van Laak v. the Netherlands, (no.17669/91, Commission decision of 31 March 1993, DR 74, p. 156) he could not).