Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ÜRPER AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

  Art. 10, Art. 10 Abs. 1, Art. 10 Abs. 2, Art. 41, Art. 46, Art. 46 Abs. 2 MRK
  Violation of Art. 10 Remainder inadmissible Pecuniary damage - award Non-pecuniary damage - award (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 20.10.2009 - 14526/07, 14747/07, 15022/07, 15737/07, 36137/07, 47245/07, 50371/07, 50372/07, 54637/07
• EGMR, 10.09.2014 - 14526/07
• EGMR - 14526/07

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (7)

• EGMR, 21.01.1999 - 29183/95

  FRESSOZ ET ROIRE c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.10.2009 - 14526/07

  In cases, such as the present one, concerning the written media, the national margin of appreciation is circumscribed by the interests of a democratic society in ensuring and maintaining a free press (see Fressoz and Roire v. France [GC], no. 29183/95, § 45, ECHR 1999-I; Alınak v. Turkey, no. 40287/98, § 36, 29 March 2005).
• EGMR, 20.05.1999 - 21980/93

  BLADET TROMSØ ET STENSAAS c. NORVEGE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.10.2009 - 14526/07

  Not only does the press have the task of imparting such information and ideas, but the public also has a right to receive them (see Bladet Tromsø and Stensaas v. Norway [GC], no. 21980/93, § 62, ECHR 1999-III).
• EGMR, 16.03.2000 - 23144/93

  OZGUR GUNDEM c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.10.2009 - 14526/07

  However, the Court accepts that some pecuniary loss must have resulted from the violation found in relation to the suspension of the publication of the newspapers for periods ranging from 15 days to a month (see, mutatis mutandis, Özgür Gündem v. Turkey, no. 23144/93, § 80, ECHR 2000-III).

 
• EGMR, 18.07.2000 - 26680/95

  SENER v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.10.2009 - 14526/07

  The Court has stated on several occasions that, although the press must not overstep the bounds required, for example, to provide protection against threats of violence, disorder or crime, its duty is nevertheless to impart - in a manner consistent with its obligations and responsibilities - information and ideas on all matters of public interest, including divisive ones (see, for example, Sener v. Turkey, no. 26680/95, § 41, 18 July 2000; Sürek v. Turkey (no. 1) [GC], no. 26682/95, § 59, ECHR 1999-IV).
• EGMR, 17.07.2001 - 39288/98

  EKIN ASSOCIATION v. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.10.2009 - 14526/07

  However, it also refers to the quality of law, which requires that legal norms should be accessible to the person concerned, their consequences foreseeable and their compatibility with the rule of law ensured (see, among others, Association Ekin v. France, no. 39288/98, § 44, ECHR 2001-VIII).
• EGMR, 18.05.2004 - 58148/00

  ÉDITIONS PLON c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.10.2009 - 14526/07

  As freedom of the press was at stake, the national authorities had only a limited margin of appreciation to decide whether there was a "pressing social need" to take the measures in question (Editions Plon v. France, no. 58148/00, § 44, ECHR 2004-IV).
• EGMR, 26.11.1991 - 13585/88

  OBSERVER ET GUARDIAN c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.10.2009 - 14526/07

  Although freedom of expression may be subject to exceptions, these must be narrowly interpreted and the necessity for any restriction must be convincingly established (see Observer and Guardian v. the United Kingdom, 26 November 1991, § 59, Series A no. 216).