Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  RADOSZEWSKA-ZAKOSCIELNA v. POLAND

  (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Neu Zitiert selbst (2)

• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96

  FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.10.2009 - 858/08

  The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII).
• EGMR, 19.10.2004 - 67299/01

  DUBJAKOVA v. SLOVAKIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.10.2009 - 858/08

  The Court will have regard in this connection to the compatibility of the amount with its own awards in similar cases, bearing in mind the principles which it has developed for determining victim status and for assessing the amount of non-pecuniary compensation to be awarded (see Cocchiarella v. Italy [GC], no. 64886/01, §§ 85-107, ECHR 2006-...,; Scordino v. Italy (no. 1) [GC], no. 36813/97, §§ 193-215, ECHR-2006-...; Dubjakova v. Slovakia (dec.), no. 67299/01, 10 October 2004; and Arvanitaki-Roboti and Others v. Greece [GC], no. 27278/03, §§ 27-32, ECHR 2008-...).

• EGMR, 07.01.2010 - 25965/04

  RANTSEV v. CYPRUS AND RUSSIA

  Whether this is appropriate in a particular case depends on whether the unilateral declaration offers a sufficient basis for finding that respect for human rights as defined in the Convention does not require the Court to continue its examination of the case (Article 37 § 1 in fine; see also, inter alia, Tahsin Acar v. Turkey (preliminary objection) [GC], no. 26307/95, § 75, ECHR 2003-VI; and Radoszewska-Zakoscielna v. Poland, no. 858/08, § 50, 20 October 2009).
• EGMR, 05.04.2022 - 19059/18

  BENKHARBOUCHE AND JANAH v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Whether this is appropriate in a particular case depends on whether the Unilateral Declaration offers a sufficient basis for finding that respect for human rights as defined in the Convention does not require the Court to continue its examination of the case (Article 37 § 1 in fine; see, inter alia, Tahsin Acar v. Turkey (preliminary objection) [GC], no. 26307/95, § 75, ECHR 2003-VI, and Radoszewska-Zakoscielna v. Poland, no. 858/08, § 50, 20 October 2009).