Volltextveröffentlichungen (3)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  NEJDET SAHIN AND PERIHAN SAHIN c. TURQUIE

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1 MRK
  Non-violation de l'art. 6-1 (französisch)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  NEJDET SAHIN AND PERIHAN SAHIN v. TURKEY

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1 MRK
  No violation of Art. 6-1 (englisch)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  NEJDET SAHIN AND PERIHAN SAHIN v. TURKEY - [Deutsche Übersetzung] Zusammenfassung durch das Österreichische Institut für Menschenrechte (ÖIM)

  [DEU] No violation of Art. 6-1

Kurzfassungen/Presse

• RIS Bundeskanzleramt Österreich (Ausführliche Zusammenfassung)

Sonstiges (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Videoaufzeichnung der mündlichen Verhandlung)

  Nejdet Sahin and Perihan Sahin v. Turkey

  [09.03.2011]

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [FRE]

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 27.05.2010 - 13279/05
• EGMR, 20.10.2011 - 13279/05

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Neu Zitiert selbst (8)

• EGMR, 02.11.2010 - 38155/02

  STEFANICA AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.10.2011 - 13279/05

  The Court has also been called upon to pronounce judgment on conflicting decisions that may be made within a single court of appeal (see Tudor Tudor v. Romania, no. 21911/03, 24 March 2009) or by different district courts ruling at last instance (see Stefanica and Others v. Romania, no. 38155/02, 2 November 2010).

  One of the fundamental aspects of the rule of law is the principle of legal certainty (see Brumarescu v. Romania [GC], no. 28342/95, § 61, ECHR 1999 VII), which, inter alia, guarantees a certain stability in legal situations and contributes to public confidence in the courts (see, mutatis mutandis, Stefanica and Others, no. 38155/02, § 38, 2 November 2010).

• EGMR, 18.02.1999 - 26083/94

  WAITE AND KENNEDY v. GERMANY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.10.2011 - 13279/05

  It is primarily for the national authorities, notably the courts, to resolve problems of interpretation of domestic legislation (see Brualla Gómez de la Torre v. Spain, 19 December 1997, § 31, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-VIII; Waite and Kennedy v. Germany [GC], no. 26083/94, § 54, ECHR 1999-I; and Saez Maeso v. Spain, no. 77837/01, § 22, 9 November 2004).
• EGMR, 08.07.1999 - 23536/94

  Strafrechtliche Verfolgung auf Grund der Veröffentlichung eines Buches mit …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.10.2011 - 13279/05

  However clearly drafted a legal provision may be, there is an inevitable element of judicial interpretation (see, amongst other authorities, Baskaya and OkçuoÄŸlu v. Turkey [GC], nos. 23536/94 and 24408/94, § 39, ECHR 1999-IV).

 
• EGMR, 28.10.1999 - 24846/94

  ZIELINSKI ET PRADAL & GONZALEZ ET AUTRES c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.10.2011 - 13279/05

  The Court has been called upon a number of times to examine cases concerning conflicting court decisions (see, among other authorities, Zielinski and Pradal and Gonzalez and Others v. France [GC], nos. 24846/94 and 34165/96 to 34173/96, ECHR 1999-VII; Paduraru v. Romania, no. 63252/00, ECHR 2005-XII (extracts); Beian v. Romania (no. 1), no. 30658/05, ECHR 2007-XIII (extracts); and Iordan Iordanov and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 23530/02, 2 July 2009), and has thus had an opportunity to pronounce judgment on the conditions in which conflicting decisions of domestic supreme courts were in breach of the fair trial requirement enshrined in Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (see Perez Arias v. Spain, no. 32978/03, § 25, 28 June 2007; Beian (no. 1), cited above, §§ 34-40; Stefan and Stef v. Romania, nos.
• EGMR, 02.12.2008 - 42162/02

  SCHWARZKOPF ET TAUSSIK c. REPUBLIQUE TCHEQUE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.10.2011 - 13279/05

  24428/03 and 26977/03, §§ 33-36, 27 January 2009; Iordan Iordanov and Others, cited above, §§ 48-49; and Schwarzkopf and Taussik v. the Czech Republic (dec.), no. 42162/02, 2 December 2008).
• EGMR, 27.01.2009 - 24428/03

  STEFAN et STEF c. ROUMANIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.10.2011 - 13279/05

  24428/03 and 26977/03, §§ 33-36, 27 January 2009; Iordan Iordanov and Others, cited above, §§ 48-49; and Schwarzkopf and Taussik v. the Czech Republic (dec.), no. 42162/02, 2 December 2008).
• EGMR, 26.02.1993 - 13396/87

  PADOVANI v. ITALY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.10.2011 - 13279/05

  Here, therefore, the Court's task is not to review, in abstracto, the compatibility with the Convention of Turkey's court system, with its two different types of administrative court, but to determine, in concreto, the effect of the resulting conflict of case-law on the right to a fair trial enshrined in Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (see, for example and mutatis mutandis, Padovani v. Italy, 26 February 1993, § 24, Series A no. 257-B).
• EGMR, 28.06.2007 - 32978/03

  PEREZ ARIAS c. ESPAGNE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.10.2011 - 13279/05

  The Court has been called upon a number of times to examine cases concerning conflicting court decisions (see, among other authorities, Zielinski and Pradal and Gonzalez and Others v. France [GC], nos. 24846/94 and 34165/96 to 34173/96, ECHR 1999-VII; Paduraru v. Romania, no. 63252/00, ECHR 2005-XII (extracts); Beian v. Romania (no. 1), no. 30658/05, ECHR 2007-XIII (extracts); and Iordan Iordanov and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 23530/02, 2 July 2009), and has thus had an opportunity to pronounce judgment on the conditions in which conflicting decisions of domestic supreme courts were in breach of the fair trial requirement enshrined in Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (see Perez Arias v. Spain, no. 32978/03, § 25, 28 June 2007; Beian (no. 1), cited above, §§ 34-40; Stefan and Stef v. Romania, nos.

• OLG Zweibrücken, 15.07.2013 - 7 U 244/11

  Anwaltsvertrag: Schlechterfüllung eines Anwaltsvertrages; Sorgfaltspflichten bei …

  Der EGMR ersetzt deren Auslegungen nicht durch seine eigenen, außer bei Vorliegen von Willkür (…EGMR, Urt. v. 12.06.2003 -/97 -van Kuck/Deutschland m.w.N.; Urt. v. 20.10.2011 - 13279/05 - Sahin/Türkei).
• Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 26.10.2023 - C-554/21

  HANN-INVEST - Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung - Art. 19 Abs. 1 Unterabs. 2 EUV - …

  69 EGMR, 18. Dezember 2008, Unédic/Frankreich (CE:ECHR:2008:1218JUD002015304, § 74), EGMR, 29. November 2016, Griechisch-katholische Kirchengemeinde Lupeni u. a./Rumänien (CE:ECHR:2016:1129JUD007694311, § 116), sowie EGMR, 20. Oktober 2011, Nejdet Sahin und Perihan Sahin (CE:ECHR:2011:1020JUD001327905, § 58).