Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  DILEK ASLAN v. TURKEY

  Remainder inadmissible;No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);No violation ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (3)Neu Zitiert selbst (7)

• EGMR, 25.08.1993 - 13308/87

  CHORHERR v. AUSTRIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.10.2015 - 34364/08

  The Court reiterates that it has previously held that the arrest and detention of protesters may constitute an interference with the right to freedom of expression (see Chorherr v. Austria, 25 August 1993, § 23, Series A no. 266-B; Lucas v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 39013/02, 18 March 2003; and Açik and Others v. Turkey, no. 31451/03, § 40, 13 January 2009).
• EGMR, 14.10.2008 - 32347/02

  MEHMET EREN v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.10.2015 - 34364/08

  As such, the Court considers that the medical reports in question cannot be relied on as evidence for proving or disproving the applicant's allegations of ill-treatment (see Mehmet Eren v. Turkey, no. 32347/02, §§ 40-42, 14 October 2008; Gülbahar and Others v. Turkey, no. 5264/03, § 53, 21 October 2008; and Balliktas v. Turkey, no. 7070/03, § 28, 20 October 2009).
• EGMR, 18.12.2012 - 3111/10

  Menschenrechtsgerichtshof verurteilt Türkei wegen Online-Zensur

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.10.2015 - 34364/08

  The Court reiterates that any interference will constitute a breach of Article 10 of the Convention unless it is "prescribed by law", pursues one or more legitimate aims under paragraph 2 of that provision and is "necessary in a democratic society" for the achievement of those aims (see, among many other authorities, Ahmet Yildirim v. Turkey, no. 3111/10, § 56, ECHR 2012).

 
• EGMR, 21.10.2008 - 5264/03

  GÜLBAHAR AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.10.2015 - 34364/08

  As such, the Court considers that the medical reports in question cannot be relied on as evidence for proving or disproving the applicant's allegations of ill-treatment (see Mehmet Eren v. Turkey, no. 32347/02, §§ 40-42, 14 October 2008; Gülbahar and Others v. Turkey, no. 5264/03, § 53, 21 October 2008; and Balliktas v. Turkey, no. 7070/03, § 28, 20 October 2009).
• EGMR, 20.10.2009 - 7070/03

  BALLIKTAS v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.10.2015 - 34364/08

  As such, the Court considers that the medical reports in question cannot be relied on as evidence for proving or disproving the applicant's allegations of ill-treatment (see Mehmet Eren v. Turkey, no. 32347/02, §§ 40-42, 14 October 2008; Gülbahar and Others v. Turkey, no. 5264/03, § 53, 21 October 2008; and Balliktas v. Turkey, no. 7070/03, § 28, 20 October 2009).
• EGMR, 05.10.2000 - 57834/00

  KABLAN contre la TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.10.2015 - 34364/08

  On the other hand, the Court observes that the applicant raised allegations of battery, sexual assault and threats both before the national authorities and the Court and that the medical reports submitted to the Court lack detail and fall short of both the standards recommended by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) and the guidelines set out in "the Istanbul Protocol", which are regularly taken into account by the Court in its examination of cases concerning ill-treatment (see, inter alia, Akkoç v. Turkey, nos. 22947/93 and 22948/93, § 118, ECHR 2000-X), and the guidelines set out in "the Istanbul Protocol" (see Bati and Others v. Turkey, nos. 33097/96 and 57834/00, § 100, ECHR 2004-IV (extracts)).
• EGMR, 03.06.2004 - 33097/96

  BATI AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.10.2015 - 34364/08

  On the other hand, the Court observes that the applicant raised allegations of battery, sexual assault and threats both before the national authorities and the Court and that the medical reports submitted to the Court lack detail and fall short of both the standards recommended by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) and the guidelines set out in "the Istanbul Protocol", which are regularly taken into account by the Court in its examination of cases concerning ill-treatment (see, inter alia, Akkoç v. Turkey, nos. 22947/93 and 22948/93, § 118, ECHR 2000-X), and the guidelines set out in "the Istanbul Protocol" (see Bati and Others v. Turkey, nos. 33097/96 and 57834/00, § 100, ECHR 2004-IV (extracts)).

• EGMR, 13.09.2016 - 58271/10

  A.S. c. TURQUIE

  Or, la présente requête ayant été introduite le 21 septembre 2010, 1a formulation de ce grief est tardive (voir, en ce sens, Dilek Aslan c. Turquie, no 34364/08, § 82, 20 octobre 2015).
• EGMR, 16.02.2021 - 38949/09

  ILTÜMÜR OZAN ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE

  Ils étaient donc tenus d'user de ce moyen procédural, à l'instar d'autres requérants qui en avaient eux aussi tiré profit auparavant (voir, parmi beaucoup d'autres, Dilek Aslan c. Turquie, no 34364/08, § 41, 20 octobre 2015, et Kaya c. Turquie (déc.), no 5168/05, 14 juin 2011, et les références qui figurent dans ces deux affaires).
• EGMR, 21.02.2019 - 7088/11

  GABLISHVILI AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA

  It observes that the three arresting officers sustained a variety of injuries during the incident (see Dilek Aslan v. Turkey, no. 34364/08, § 48, 20 October 2015, and, a contrario, Dedovskiy and Others v. Russia, no. 7178/03, § 82, ECHR 2008 (extracts)).